Home Secretary Shabana Mahmood has announced proposals to establish new 'safe and legal' routes for asylum seekers to come to the United Kingdom, a move that has generated significant opposition.

The plans reportedly aim to allow approximately 10,000 asylum seekers to enter the UK through sponsored pathways, with universities, community groups, and charities potentially involved in providing housing and employment support.

Critics have voiced strong objections, with the shadow home secretary, Chris Philp, stating that new routes should not be created while illegal immigration persists. He highlighted that tens of thousands of individuals have entered the country via small boats since the last election. Reform's migration spokesman, Zia Yusuf, suggested that if Mayor Andy Burnham supports such policies, he should present them in a manifesto and call for a general election.

Incumbent Mayor Andy Burnham has been criticised by opponents, who argue he has taken a more left-leaning stance on asylum seekers

The controversy coincides with internal friction within the Home Office. Ms. Mahmood had publicly called for Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer to dismiss Mike Tapp, the under-secretary for migration and citizenship, for writing an unauthorized newspaper article.

The Home Secretary urged Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer to remove Mike Tapp (pictured) as under-secretary for migration and citizenship after he wrote a newspaper article without authorisation

Ms. Mahmood asserted that Mr. Tapp had violated the ministerial code by breaching collective responsibility. However, Prime Minister Starmer reportedly sided with Mr. Tapp, refusing to dismiss him. Some MPs from both sides of the political spectrum have suggested that Ms. Mahmood's actions in calling for Mr. Tapp's dismissal might also constitute a breach of the ministerial code. Concerns have also been raised about Ms. Mahmood's subsequent actions, including barring Mr. Tapp from accessing official documents and attending meetings, which could also be viewed as code violations.

Sources indicate that Ms. Mahmood declined to comment on the matter, and a source close to her suggested she would not refer herself to the ethics watchdog.