Newsom's 2028 Ambitions Dim as He Pledges Not to Run if Harris Competes
The California governor's recent statement to CNN has raised questions about his political instincts and potential presidential aspirations.
California Governor Gavin Newsom has generated significant discussion regarding his 2028 presidential ambitions following a recent interview with CNN's Jake Tapper. In the exchange, which took place while the two were fishing, Newsom stated that he would not run for president if Vice President Kamala Harris, also a Californian, decides to seek the office.
"Of course not. Why would I?" Newsom responded when Tapper expressed surprise. "I wouldn’t do that to her, I wouldn’t do that to you, I wouldn’t waste everyone’s time. Who needs that?"
Newsom suggested that a contest between himself and Harris would result in them undermining each other's campaigns, potentially clearing a path for another candidate. He also appeared to concede that the presumed 2024 Democratic nominee had already had an opportunity to run.
This declaration has led to speculation about Newsom's political strategy and the potential impact on his future aspirations. Critics argue that by making such a statement, Newsom has boxed himself into a corner, particularly given his long-held interest in a presidential run. With his term as governor coming to a close, some suggest that his current window of opportunity for a national campaign may be narrowing.
Should Newsom choose not to run, he may face a significant delay in attempting a presidential bid, potentially waiting another six to ten years. Furthermore, if he ultimately decides to run and Harris also enters the race, he has now provided fodder for opponents to question his campaign's integrity and his prior statements.
The situation has drawn parallels to former UN Ambassador Nikki Haley's 2021 pledge not to challenge Donald Trump for the Republican nomination, which some argue complicated her subsequent campaign. Newsom's allies may find it challenging to reconcile any future criticisms of Harris with his current statement of deference.
Analysts suggest that a Harris campaign would likely leverage Newsom's remarks, and even if Harris does not run, the governor may have inadvertently supplied ammunition for other potential rivals.
The article posits that a candidate's primary motivation for seeking the presidency should be a strong belief in their fitness for the job. Newsom's comments, however, are interpreted as indicating a decision based on convenience rather than conviction, suggesting he might run if it is "convenient" and avoid a run against Harris if it is too much of a "hassle."
This approach is contrasted with that of potentially more dynamic Democratic figures such as Jon Ossoff and Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez. Ultimately, the piece argues that Newsom's ambition and his efforts to manage it have been exposed, with his remarks intended to convey humility instead having the opposite effect and reminding voters why he may not be suited for the presidency.