A Hofstra University political science professor, Richard Himelfarb, is facing a potential termination process following an investigation into a remark he made in November 2025. The investigation stems from a complaint filed by a colleague, Santiago Slabodsky, who alleged that Himelfarb's use of the phrase "word salad" constituted racial discrimination.
The incident occurred during a faculty meeting where new courses were being proposed. According to Himelfarb, Slabodsky presented his proposals and then launched into a lengthy, meandering response to objections from other professors, which Himelfarb described as "complete word salad; I don’t understand a thing Professor Slabodsky said."
The following day, Slabodsky, who is of Argentinian origin, filed a complaint asserting that Himelfarb's comment disparaged his accent and South American heritage. The complaint stated that Himelfarb "impugning not only my language ability but also my sense and clarity."
Hofstra University's Human Resources Department informed Himelfarb in mid-February that there was "reasonable cause" to believe he had disparaged Slabodsky's ethnicity, initiating the investigation. Himelfarb has described the process as a "nearly one-year investigatory nightmare," involving extensive communication with lawyers and participation in hearings.
Efforts to resolve the issue included Himelfarb offering an apology, which Slabodsky initially demanded publicly. However, Slabodsky reportedly rejected a proposed written apology reviewed by university officials. The case was subsequently escalated to the University Harassment Board, a committee that can recommend disciplinary action, including termination, even for tenured faculty.
In May, Himelfarb enlisted the support of the Foundation for Individual Rights and Expression (FIRE) and the Academic Freedom Alliance. Following his retention of outside legal counsel, Slabodsky filed a second complaint, alleging retaliation. Himelfarb stated he is not seeking legal action but retained counsel after losing confidence in the administration's handling of the case.
Himelfarb has suggested he is being targeted due to his conservative views and that the investigation aims to create a "chilling effect" on faculty who question their colleagues. He questioned whether faculty would feel comfortable discussing controversial topics under such circumstances.
A spokesperson for Hofstra University stated that no disciplinary action has been taken, and the matter is proceeding according to university procedures. The spokesperson added that "First Amendment considerations are highly context specific" and declined further comment. Slabodsky did not respond to requests for comment.
