FIFA has rejected an appeal from the Belgian Football Association (RBFA) to reinstate a one-match ban for U.S. national team striker Folarin Balogun, allowing him to play in the team's World Cup round of 16 match against Belgium. The decision, confirmed by FIFA on Sunday, came after reports emerged that U.S. President Donald Trump had personally contacted FIFA President Gianni Infantino regarding the ban.
The suspension of the ban was initially announced by FIFA on Sunday, stating that Balogun would serve a probationary period of one year for the offense. This decision was met with anger by the RBFA, which subsequently launched an appeal.
In a statement, the RBFA expressed frustration with FIFA's process, claiming they had not received sufficient grounds for the decision or requested documentation, which they stated was a breach of FIFA regulations. The association also indicated that they contested Balogun's eligibility for the match.
FIFA President Infantino addressed the controversy in a statement, emphasizing the independence of FIFA's judicial bodies. He confirmed he had received a call from President Trump, as he does from other heads of state and officials, but explained that he informed Trump that an independent legal process was underway and would be decided by the competent bodies. Infantino reiterated that FIFA's judicial bodies operate autonomously and uphold the integrity of football.
Balogun received a straight red card during the USA's victory over Bosnia and Herzegovina for a challenge on defender Tarik Muharemovic. While replays showed the striker's cleats scraping the opponent's leg, the decision to issue a ban had sparked considerable debate online.
The USMNT acknowledged FIFA's decision and expressed pleasure that Balogun is eligible to compete, stating that their focus is now on the upcoming match against Belgium. The team was reportedly informed of the decision shortly before it was widely publicized.
The RBFA, however, indicated they would continue to pursue the matter, citing concerns over the "fundamental principles of ethics, fair competition, and the interests of football as a whole." The association stated they had not received official grounds for the decision and suggested they were exploring all potential options, including legal action.