Closing arguments have been presented in the child abuse trial of professional snooker player Graeme Dott. The 49-year-old faces accusations of lewd and libidinous behavior towards a girl and a boy, with alleged incidents occurring between 1993 and 2010.
During the trial, Dott has consistently denied the allegations, describing them as "disgusting." His defense has argued that he "need not prove one thing" and maintains the presumption of innocence, asserting that the prosecution has not proven the case "beyond reasonable doubt."
The prosecutor stated that the evidence provided by the boy, who is now in his 20s, was "straightforward and not contrived." According to the prosecution, the abuse began shortly after Dott won the world championship in May 2006. The alleged incidents included molestation in a shower at a Lanarkshire home, being given money as a "reward strategy," and groping while Dott was playing online poker.
The advocate depute suggested that there were "significant similarities" in the testimonies of the witnesses. The defense, however, advised that the evidence from both accusers should be treated with "caution." The defense noted that the girl eventually disclosed her allegations to several individuals, but argued that "if someone is not telling the truth, then no matter how many individuals are told something it does not lend the lie any more credibility." The defense concluded by stating that "experience tells us that sometimes complainers do lie" and asked for Dott's denials to be accepted.
No verdict has been reached following the closing arguments.