The United States is celebrating its 250th anniversary, facing the challenge of ensuring its continued prosperity and relevance for another two and a half centuries. Despite recent advancements in technology and resilience shown during crises like the COVID-19 pandemic, national pride appears to have waned, with polls indicating a significant decline, especially among Democrats.
Recent polling suggests that while a majority of Americans express pride in their country, the intensity of that pride has fallen over the past two decades. Gallup data shows that the percentage of Republicans who identify as "very" or "extremely proud" remains robust, even showing an increase for some over the last 20 years. In contrast, the share of Democrats reporting extreme pride has hit a record low, dropping from a high of 65% in 2003 to just 14% currently. Independents have also shown a similar trend of decreased pride.
The notes suggest that the decline in Democratic pride has accelerated since 2015, coinciding with what is described as "Trump Derangement Syndrome." This phenomenon, according to the analysis, has led to a perception among some Democrats that threats like right-wing fascism, imminent climate catastrophe due to Republican "denialism," and pervasive "white supremacy" are imminent. Concurrently, a segment of Democratic voters, associated with the Democratic Socialists of America, is described as holding anti-American sentiments on principle and gaining influence within the party.
Despite these internal divisions, the United States has experienced what is characterized as the greatest run of any country in history over its 250 years. To endure for another 250 years, the argument is made that the nation must overcome intense polarization and animosity. The hope is that political divisions, while exacerbated by figures like Donald Trump, can be managed, as he is expected to be out of office in a few years. The primary call to action is for Democrats to re-evaluate their relationship with the country, separating their views of political leaders from their national identity and working to curb the influence of radical elements within their party.
Furthermore, the analysis advocates for resisting the temptation to fundamentally alter established institutions such as the nine-member Supreme Court or the Electoral College. Instead, it urges a return to the historical approach of both parties: advancing agendas through the existing political system, which is designed to facilitate change democratically and fairly. The piece draws a parallel to the nation's survival through the intense polarization that led to the Civil War 166 years ago, suggesting that contemporary challenges, while significant, are surmountable if the nation adheres to its foundational processes.