England's departure from the World Cup has been attributed to a combination of questionable tactical decisions by manager Thomas Tuchel and a return to passive play, echoing criticisms from previous tournaments. The team conceded a late equalizer and then a stoppage-time winner to Argentina in the semi-final, falling short of a place in the final.
Despite taking a 55th-minute lead through Anthony Gordon, England struggled to maintain control of the match. According to analysis from Ian Ladyman, a significant shift occurred after scoring, with the team adopting a more defensive posture, including a switch to a back five with 18 minutes remaining. This approach is seen as having invited relentless pressure from Argentina, who had previously shown vulnerability.
Ladyman suggests that this tactical shift, made by Tuchel, sent a clear message of preserving the lead rather than extending it, leaving England without meaningful attacks in the closing stages. The report points to a familiar pattern, reminiscent of past England campaigns where defensive stances have led to conceding late goals. While acknowledging Argentina's own comeback capabilities and improvements in the second half, the analysis emphasizes England's role in their own downfall.
Former England captain Wayne Rooney was quoted as saying that managers in such situations should be more proactive, seeking to change the tempo of the game rather than conceding ground. He criticized Tuchel's decisions, stating, "He got it wrong. This was the biggest test and we failed it."
The article notes that while England's tournament progression—semi-final, final, quarter-final, final, semi-final—shows improvement over certain past eras, the team has been characterized by big moments rather than consistent performances. The spirit and moments of individual brilliance, such as Gordon's goal, are highlighted, but a lack of clear tactical identity under Tuchel is also observed.
Despite the setback, the analysis suggests Tuchel's position should not be questioned, citing his ability to build on previous foundations and his positive relationship with players. The team is described as having potential for future success, with emerging talents like Jude Bellingham, Declan Rice, and Anthony Gordon expected to develop further. However, questions are raised about squad selection, with suggestions that certain players like Cole Palmer and Morgan Gibbs-White were overlooked, and a perceived lack of improvement in central defense.
Argentina's performance, particularly in the latter stages, is praised for its relentlessness. The contribution of Lionel Messi, despite his limited running, is emphasized, with his ability to read the game and make decisive plays, including the assist for the winning goal, being a key factor. The report concludes by looking forward to Messi's participation in another World Cup final.
Furthermore, the officiating in the match is brought into question. Referee Ismail Elfath is criticized for not taking firm control early on, with a delay in issuing yellow cards and an initial card shown to an England player being described as a "joke." The article advocates for FIFA to prioritize appointing the best officials for crucial matches, irrespective of political considerations.
