EA Sports College Football 27 is set to release in July, and the game's initial team ratings have generated discussion among fans. Analysis of these ratings suggests that several programs may have been given ratings that do not accurately reflect their talent level.
Teams Rated Too Low
Georgia's overall rating of 87 has been called too low by some analysts. Despite the narrative surrounding NIL and the transfer portal, the Bulldogs under head coach Kirby Smart have maintained strong recruiting efforts. The team returns experienced quarterback Gunner Stockton, features running back Nate Frazier, and has added transfer portal addition Isaiah Canion at wide receiver. The defense is expected to be strong with players like defensive tackle Jordan Hall and safety KJ Bolden. Despite these factors, the 87 overall rating is seen by some as an underestimate of the team's potential, particularly in the SEC.
Clemson's rating of 83 is also considered by some to be too low, given the team's consistent recruitment of top-tier talent. While Clemson has not heavily utilized the transfer portal, they have consistently signed strong recruiting classes within the ACC. Players like linebacker Sammy Brown and wide receivers T.J. Moore and Bryant Wesco, products of traditional recruiting and development, are on the roster. While not expected to be among the highest-rated teams, the 83 overall mark is viewed as a significant undervaluation of the team's talent.
Alabama received an 86 overall rating, which some believe is too low given the roster's depth of talent. While Crimson Tide fans may compare the current state to the program's past success under Nick Saban, the roster is still populated with highly recruited players. Head coach Kalen DeBoer has maintained a high level of recruiting. Although on-field performance remains to be seen, the objective talent on the roster suggests a higher rating may be warranted.
Teams Rated Too High
Indiana's 90 overall rating has been questioned, with the argument that the team's recruiting success does not align with such a high ranking. While head coach Curt Cignetti and his staff have achieved success, the team's talent level is considered by some to be lower than their rating suggests. Their transfer portal class, while ranked in the top 10 by 247Sports, consisted of a smaller number of transfers, many of whom were three-star recruits. The departure of their Heisman-winning quarterback further raises questions about the justification for a 90 overall rating.
BYU's 86 overall rating has also drawn scrutiny. While the Cougars may have had a successful 2025 season and are projected for a strong 2026, comparisons of talent depth with other programs suggest their rating might be inflated. Recruiting rankings and transfer portal additions do not significantly differentiate BYU from other teams, and projections for NFL draft picks suggest a talent disparity. Despite expectations of competing for a conference title, the rating is seen as potentially overstating their talent advantage over other teams.
Auburn's offensive rating of 86 has been specifically highlighted as too high. While the team recruited well on offense under former coach Hugh Freeze, many key players, including top receivers, transferred after his departure. New head coach Alex Golesh has brought players from his previous coaching position, but their performance in the SEC remains unproven. The 86 offensive rating is considered premature, as more time is needed to assess the performance of the current offensive roster before assigning such a high mark.