A dispute over a proposed solar panel installation has been resolved, with the initial objector now expressing strong support for the plan. The complainant, Chris Chadwick, stated that his initial concerns stemmed from a lack of detailed information available online regarding the application.
Chadwick explained that the application initially stated "72 panels," leading him to believe they would cover the entire available area. He also noted that he saw the planning application near the end of its notification period, by which time much of the relevant data was no longer accessible on the website.
After gaining a more comprehensive understanding of the project, Chadwick shifted his stance. He credited Len Shephard, the project proponent, with putting significant thought into ensuring the plan's success and addressing his concerns. Chadwick is now a "complete supporter of the plan," citing Shephard's consideration of all his questions.
Key details that swayed Chadwick include the fact that the panels are elevated off the ground, allowing sunlight to reach the grass and supporting wildlife. He also highlighted that the decision is not commercially driven, suggesting that Shephard will not see a financial return within his lifetime, characterizing it as an "altruistic decision to actually do the right thing."
A site assessment for the application has recently been completed, according to the States' planning website.
