A literary controversy has erupted in France following allegations that Canadian-Haitian author Thélyson Orélien, a sensation in the French book scene, may have used artificial intelligence to write his debut novel, "C'était ça ou mourir" (It was either that or die).

Orélien, 38, recently received the Prix du Roman Fnac, an early literary prize of the season. He is also a finalist for the Goncourt and Renaudot awards, two of the most prominent French language literary accolades. However, a group identified as "Balance ton Claude" (Denounce your Claude) claimed on Tuesday that the novel was "almost totally" created by AI.

The group stated that testing various passages of the manuscript with a program called Pangram yielded identical results, indicating 100 percent AI generation. "Balance ton Claude" asserts that Pangram is highly accurate and has a negligible chance of error.

Orélien, who was born in Haiti and relocated to Montreal in 2010, has vehemently denied the accusations. "I have always loved creation and literature. I can't see why I would feel compelled to use a machine," he told the newspaper Libération. He indicated that he and his editor were preparing documentation to authenticate his authorship.

"My traditions are Haitian and Caribbean. The images, the repetitions and the rhythms are the living word, they are my own," Orélien stated.

His publishing house, Grasset, defended him, calling the allegations "atrociously injurious to a writer with an exceptional life-story" whose "work of creation is original and powerful."

The novel itself narrates the journey of a teacher fleeing gang violence in Haiti, detailing his experiences before reaching Canada, where he rediscovers "the right to breathe without fear."

This situation echoes a previous controversy involving Trinidadian writer Jamir Nazir, whose Commonwealth Short Story prize was initially rescinded in July due to similar AI-writing allegations. The prize was later reinstated after organizers were satisfied with the authenticity of the work.

Critics of AI detection tools, such as Pangram, point to their unreliability. Different programs can produce varying results when analyzing the same texts, and they do not definitively determine authorship. Instead, these tools identify patterns common in AI-generated content, which can also appear in human writing.

Research suggests that AI detectors may incorrectly flag human-written text as AI-generated and fail to identify AI content, especially if it has been edited. Furthermore, some argue that these programs, often built for standardized languages like English or French, may struggle to accurately interpret texts incorporating dialects from regions such as the Caribbean.

Despite these criticisms, "Balance ton Claude" maintained that Pangram had erred in identifying AI-generated text only once in every 24,400 instances. Modern AI detectors analyze probabilities and statistics of linguistic patterns rather than direct text comparison for plagiarism.

As AI becomes increasingly integrated into creative processes, the dispute over Orélien's novel is expected to fuel discussions about the acceptable boundaries between human and AI creativity, including practices like using AI for idea generation and subsequent adaptation, or employing AI for editing original human work.

Orélien was born in Gonaives, Haiti, in 1988. His early writings before leaving Haiti were primarily poetic, and he later worked as a journalist in Canada. "C'était ça ou mourir," described by its Canadian publisher as their best-selling title in 60 years, is slated for translation into approximately 20 languages. Orélien informed Libération that the initial draft of the book was completed in 2019, predating the widespread availability of text-generating AI programs.