A film starring Diljit Dosanjh, which had a tumultuous path to release, was removed from the streaming platform ZEE5 for Indian audiences just two days after its debut. The film, formerly titled 'Punjab '95' and initially intended to be named 'Ghallughara,' has been embroiled in censorship disputes for nearly three years.
Censorship and Title Disputes
The Central Board of Film Certification (CBFC), India's film certification body, reportedly requested numerous changes to the film during its certification process. Director Honey Trehan stated that the CBFC's objections, which initially numbered 21, grew to 127 proposed cuts. These included a title change, removal of references to human rights activist Jaswant Singh Khalra, and edits to scenes depicting police violence. Trehan told the news website Scroll in 2025 that the board sought to remove "anything that was a reference to reality." The CBFC also raised concerns that the film could potentially trigger law-and-order problems in Punjab.
The filmmakers challenged the CBFC's demands in the Bombay High Court but later withdrew their petition, opting to accept the board's changes in hopes of securing certification. However, Trehan indicated that the list of requested alterations continued to grow.
A New Title and Streaming Debut
Facing unresolved issues, the film's producers announced a pivot from a theatrical release to a direct premiere on ZEE5 under the new title 'Satluj.' On the day of its release on the platform, Trehan stated the film had been released "without any cuts or compromises" in its original intended form, though the title 'Punjab '95' could not be retained.
Films released in Indian cinemas require CBFC certification under the Cinematograph Act. However, films released directly on streaming platforms are governed by the Information Technology Rules, 2021. These rules mandate age ratings and a code of ethics but do not exempt streaming platforms from potential takedown orders under Indian law.
Following the film's removal from ZEE5 for Indian viewers, Trehan expressed his confusion and dismay. ZEE5 stated that it stood by the film and its "creative vision" and "hoped to bring it back soon," without providing a specific timeline for its return.