François Bayrou resigned as France’s prime minister on Tuesday after losing a confidence vote by a wide margin, plunging the country deeper into a political crisis that has left the National Assembly without a clear governing majority and brought the far-right National Rally closer than ever to potential power.

The 74-year-old Bayrou had staked his brief tenure on securing support for an austerity package that included €44 billion in spending cuts. That gamble failed, and analysts and politicians said the collapse exposed a broader failure of French President Emmanuel Macron’s domestic strategy, which critics say has repeatedly concentrated power at the Élysée and misread voters’ mandates.

The vote brings renewed uncertainty about France’s immediate political future. Macron’s office said the president would appoint a new prime minister in "a matter of days," but lawmakers and party leaders warned that the scale of parliamentary fragmentation makes forming a stable government difficult. Some politicians and commentators have openly debated whether Macron should step down early, though the president remains in office until his second and final term expires in 2027.

Bayrou—whose premiership had been described by some observers as brief and unremarkable—had pushed a budget that would have frozen welfare benefits and cut healthcare spending among other measures. Supporters argued the package was needed to restore fiscal discipline; opponents said it would disproportionately hurt working families and lacked a democratic mandate after June’s snap election produced no majority for Macron’s Renaissance party.

"He has an immense amount of responsibility because this dissolution plunged the country into a crisis that should never have happened," said Christopher Weissberg, a former member of parliament and Renaissance spokesman in the National Assembly, referring to Macron’s decision last year to call snap elections that cost his party its parliamentary majority.

The crisis has highlighted long‑standing tensions between the president and other political forces. Since his rise in 2017, Macron has cultivated a top‑down governing style that critics say sidelines prime ministers, lawmakers and unions. The president’s signature domestic initiatives—including a controversial 2023 overhaul that raised the retirement age from 62 to 64—were pushed through amid large protests and persistent public opposition.

Macron’s political standing has suffered. Polls published since the government collapse showed approval ratings at historic lows for the president, who campaigned on promises to revitalize French democracy and blunt support for the far right. Critics argue that his approach has done neither, leaving a political center unable to marshal a working majority and giving the National Rally, led by Marine Le Pen, growing influence as a potential kingmaker.

Analysts also note that Macron’s recent domestic messaging has borrowed from rhetoric more commonly associated with the far right, particularly on immigration. Since taking office, his administrations have enacted tougher immigration measures, including 2023 legislation that limited birthright citizenship; large parts of that law were later struck down by the Constitutional Council. Observers said such moves have normalized xenophobic language and may have backfired by legitimizing the National Rally’s platform.

The collapse of Bayrou’s government followed months of political stalemate. Last summer’s snap election, called by Macron, removed Renaissance’s majority in the lower house and produced a fiercely divided legislature in which no single coalition can govern comfortably. Attempts to pass austerity measures without broad parliamentary backing further inflamed public anger, particularly among voters who had mobilized last year to block an outright National Rally majority by supporting left‑wing and centrist candidates.

Macron retains substantial authority in foreign policy and continues to wield the formal powers of the presidency. But many lawmakers and party figures say his capacity to shape domestic policy has been curtailed by the present impasse. For now, the immediate questions are who will be asked to form the next government and whether any new administration can command a workable majority in the Assembly.

Marine Le Pen’s National Rally has never been closer to influencing government policy at the national level, and the broader hostility to France’s political class appears to be growing. With the country’s next presidential election still two years away, the unfolding crisis has intensified debate about the future direction of French politics and the limits of Macron’s ability to deliver the reforms he has long championed.