Why Alleged GWB Shooter Was Hit With Lesser Charge in Road-Rage Death
Legal experts suggest a lack of premeditation led prosecutors to charge the retired officer with manslaughter instead of murder.

The retired police officer accused of fatally shooting a Con Edison worker in a road rage incident on the George Washington Bridge was charged with manslaughter rather than murder due to a perceived lack of premeditation, according to legal experts.
Koran Irvine, 46, a father of two and a Con Ed worker with 20 years of service, was killed Tuesday evening on the Jersey-bound side of the bridge. The incident began when the accused, Victor Romero, 62, a retired NYPD detective, allegedly tailgated Irvine's vehicle. Romero then allegedly pulled alongside Irvine's car and fired a shot that entered through the back passenger window, striking Irvine in the shoulder.
Irvine's vehicle subsequently stopped, causing a traffic buildup, before lurching across lanes and crashing into a median approximately 40 seconds later, according to a criminal complaint. Romero fled the scene but was arrested later. He was reportedly unaware he had gone to the wrong police station when attempting to turn himself in.
Prosecutors charged Romero with first-degree manslaughter. Defense lawyer Michael Bachner, who is not involved in the case, explained that prosecutors would likely face challenges proving Romero intended to kill Irvine. "The District Attorney’s office was under the theory that this arose out of an altercation with some lack of premeditation, lack of planning," Bachner stated. "It was a road rage incident where the guy went to get his gun without an intention to kill. There was no proof there was an intention to kill the guy."
Bachner further elaborated that a second-degree murder charge would require prosecutors to prove Romero acted with "depraved indifference to human life," a higher legal threshold. He suggested that Romero's actions were more indicative of consciously disregarding a risk rather than a deliberate intent to kill. "I see why [Manhattan DA Alvin] Bragg made this decision," Bachner said. "I understand the outrage over it, but I think it really does fit more into the manslaughter mold than it does into the murder charge."
However, other legal professionals expressed surprise at the decision. Veteran Big Apple defense attorney Robert Gottlieb argued that the allegations in the complaint were sufficient to warrant a murder charge. "Just relying on what’s alleged in the complaint, there is more than enough to have charged him with murder," Gottlieb insisted. "I have seen people charged with murder under less powerful evidence of depraved indifference murder."
Irvine's family expressed outrage over the manslaughter charge. "You had a retired police officer intentionally fire a bullet and kill him," said Gale Ford, Irvine's aunt, outside the court. "Instead of being murder, it’s called manslaughter? But again, in God we will trust."
Romero, who retired from the police force 25 years ago and had been working as a driver and private security guard, was ordered held on $1 million bail. His lawyer, Alan Abramson, requested a lower bail, describing his client as "a hero police officer." Abramson did not immediately return a request for comment.