US Government Says No Plans for ICE at Polls, But Activists Remain Wary
Department of Homeland Security officials dismiss concerns of immigration enforcement presence at polling places as 'fearmongering,' but advocacy groups are preparing for potential disruptions.
Department of Homeland Security officials have stated they do not plan to deploy immigration enforcement officers to patrol polling places during the upcoming elections, dismissing such concerns as "fearmongering." However, organizations representing minority voters remain apprehensive due to past rhetoric and ongoing immigration enforcement activities.
Federal law, dating back to the Civil War, prohibits the deployment of armed troops or officers to election sites unless necessary to "repel armed enemies of the United States," a high legal threshold. Election legal experts concur that this law clearly prevents broad deployment of federal agents to polling locations.
Despite these assurances, advocacy groups express worry. They point to a surge in immigration arrests as President Donald Trump pursues his deportation agenda. Organizations representing Latino, Black, and Asian American voters note that even the perception of immigration enforcement presence can deter voters, particularly in communities already anxious about ICE activities.
Earlier this year, then-acting head of Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), Todd Lyons, and the head of Customs and Border Protection, Rodney Scott, testified that they had no plans to send officers to the polls. A Department of Homeland Security official also informed state election administrators that immigration agents would not be stationed at polling sites for the midterm elections.
In September, DHS Secretary Markwayne Mullin characterized concerns about ICE officers at polling places as "fearmongering." He stated that while officers would not broadly patrol or monitor polling places, they might respond to specific incidents, such as executing a warrant or addressing a threat. Former Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche also commented, questioning objections to ICE presence by stating, "Why are there objections to sending ICE officers to polling places? Illegals can't vote."
President Trump has frequently raised concerns about noncitizen voting, despite research indicating it is rare. While he has not explicitly stated he would direct ICE officers to polling places, he has not ruled it out, saying in May that he would "do anything necessary to make sure we have honest elections." In a recent interview, when asked about dispatching ICE agents, Trump responded, "Haven't thought of it."
The Department of Homeland Security reiterated in a statement to The Associated Press that individuals in the country legally have "nothing to fear." They added, "ICE is not planning operations targeting polling locations. ICE conducts intelligence-driven targeted enforcement, and if an active public safety threat endangered a polling location, they may be arrested as a result of that targeted enforcement action."
Legal experts emphasize the strict limitations on federal law enforcement at polling sites. David Becker, director of the Center for Election Innovation & Research, called the idea of armed individuals at polling places "completely and obviously illegal" and noted that jurisdictions are preparing for potential legal challenges. Jonathan Diaz of the Campaign Legal Center interprets federal law to cover all areas where voting occurs, including early voting centers and ballot drop boxes, and views even narrow exceptions like pursuing a warrant at a poll as legally questionable.
Local election officials have been preparing for the possibility of federal agents appearing at polling places. Dean Logan, who oversees Los Angeles County elections, stated that while monitoring is welcome, distractions for voters will not be permitted.
Critics of the administration point to Trump's comments about Republicans "tak[ing] over the voting in at least 15 places" and the support for an ICE presence from some allies. Dan Freeman of the Democratic National Committee acknowledged the low likelihood of agents at voting locations but confirmed his team is prepared to pursue legal action if necessary.
Activists worry that the administration's rhetoric, combined with ongoing immigration enforcement, has created anxiety among minority voters. Juan Proaño of the League of United Latin American Citizens stated that the mere presence of ICE near polling locations can be a deterrent. He cited an incident in Syracuse, New York, where Homeland Security Investigations agents approached a polling place to serve a notice to a woman accused of posting personal information about federal officers.
Despite these concerns, advocacy groups are actively encouraging community members to vote, reminding them of their rights, and providing legal assistance. Organizations are also recruiting poll monitors and launching programs like VoteSafe in key states to bolster voter confidence and address hesitancy related to fears of armed agents at polling sites.