Andy Burnham has called for an open discussion regarding the potential merits of re-establishing free movement of people between the United Kingdom and the European Union. This stance has ignited debate, with critics accusing him of backtracking on previous commitments.
In June, Burnham reportedly told voters in Makerfield, a constituency with a significant Eurosceptic leaning, that he did not support the UK rejoining the EU. He stated his respect for the referendum decision and indicated that advocating for rejoining would undermine democratic principles. His current calls for an "honest discussion" and the possibility of going "all the way" to rejoin the EU are being interpreted by some as a deviation from these earlier statements.
Critics also point to the Labour Party's 2024 manifesto, which they claim explicitly rejected a return to free movement, the single market, or a customs union with the EU. The Daily Mail commentary suggests that Burnham's remarks are inconsistent with both his electoral promises and his party's platform, labeling it as "double-dealing."
Historical forecasts regarding the economic impact of Brexit have also become a focal point in the renewed debate. Prior to the 2016 referendum, Treasury predictions warned of significant economic downturn, including a substantial fall in GDP, increased unemployment, and declining real wages. However, subsequent economic performance, including job growth and rising wages, has been presented by some as evidence that these warnings were overstated.
Those advocating for a closer relationship with the EU or a potential return often highlight perceived economic benefits, while opponents emphasize the downsides of such a move. Concerns include the potential cancellation of trade deals established since Brexit, the relinquishing of control over trade policy, and the impact on domestic industries and technological development due to EU regulations. The financial cost of membership, including the loss of the UK's rebate and potential new entry fees or requirements like joining the Schengen zone, are also cited as significant drawbacks.
The commentary suggests that any discussion about rejoining the EU must consider both the potential disadvantages of re-engaging with what is described as an "ailing EU" and the perceived, but not necessarily realized, advantages. The prospect of revisiting the Brexit debate and reintroducing discussions on free movement is characterized as a potentially divisive and rancorous undertaking, with few voters reportedly wishing to repeat the process.