express gazette logo
The Express Gazette
Friday, October 9, 2026

UK Banknote Overhaul Sparks Debate on Historical Figures

Decision to replace figures like Churchill with wildlife on currency draws criticism for being politically motivated and disregarding public input.

US Politics • 2 hours ago
UK Banknote Overhaul Sparks Debate on Historical Figures

The Bank of England has spent £85,000 on a plan to replace historical figures, including Winston Churchill, Jane Austen, and Alan Turing, with images of wildlife on its banknotes. This move has drawn criticism, with some arguing it is a politically motivated decision driven by "woke" ideology and that public consultations were designed to pre-determine the outcome.

The bank hired a research company to conduct focus groups, which critics contend were geared towards justifying the removal of prominent historical figures deemed "elitist and divisive." Participants were reportedly not offered the option to vote for figures like Churchill, a wartime Prime Minister, or Alan Turing, a pioneer in computer science credited with shortening World War II by cracking the Enigma code. Literary figures such as Austen, Dickens, and Shakespeare, as well as artists like J.M.W. Turner and Constable, were also excluded from consideration.

Bank of England Governor Andrew Bailey reportedly cited security concerns as a reason for the change, a justification disputed by critics who question the notion that a picture of Churchill is easier to forge than that of an animal. The new designs are expected to feature animals such as the Atlantic puffin, barn owl, buff-tailed bumblebee, and European hedgehog.

Critics have drawn parallels to the currency designs in the Eurozone, which feature generic images of windows, doorways, and bridges instead of historical figures, citing this as an example of a push for "European unity." Concerns have been raised about a potential future removal of the King's image from currency, drawing a comparison to the removal of historical figures from banknotes.

The decision-making process has been contrasted with that in the United States, where changes to currency are decided by Congress. In the UK, critics argue that decisions are made by "secret committees and unaccountable quangos" and then validated by public consultations that yield predetermined results. An example cited is London Mayor Sadiq Khan's decision to extend the Ultra Low Emission Zone (ULEZ) despite two-thirds of consulted residents voting against it.

Further examples of what critics describe as the "erasure of historical figures" include actions by the Imperial War Museum. The museum has reportedly removed relics from World War I and II, with the justification that "young people aren’t interested" in these conflicts. This includes the removal of tanks, planes, a Polaris missile, and Lord Ashcroft’s collection of Victoria Crosses.

The narrative suggests a broader trend of revisionism in public institutions, schools, and universities, aimed at erasing historical narratives deemed inconvenient by current cultural sensibilities. This perceived trend is seen as extending to the Bank of England, previously considered an independent institution.


Sources