express gazette logo
The Express Gazette
Wednesday, September 23, 2026

'Ted Lasso' Season 4 Episode 8 Recap: An Overly Paced Episode Relies on Familiar Tropes

The latest installment of the Apple TV+ series feels longer than it is, with a 'comedy of remarriage' and a 'Watergate' reference that fall flat.

US Politics 2 hours ago
'Ted Lasso' Season 4 Episode 8 Recap: An Overly Paced Episode Relies on Familiar Tropes

The eighth episode of Ted Lasso's fourth season, titled "Follow the Anger," suffers from pacing issues, feeling longer and less concise than previous installments. This season's longest episode, it revisits familiar narrative structures and tropes, drawing comparisons to earlier seasons that often felt more focused. The episode features a prominent storyline involving Roy Kent and Keeley Jones, framed as a "comedy of remarriage," a rom-com structure where former lovers endure hijinks before realizing their inability to live apart. Their journey to Chelsea, where Roy is to be honored, involves a series of obstacles, including his new, technologically advanced car and a fear of public transportation. The humor derived from these situations is described as largely ineffective, with the tension between the characters failing to generate significant comedic impact. The narrative ultimately leads to a predictable reunion between Roy and Keeley.

A Nod to "All the President's Men"

Another significant plot point involves Higgins investigating Richmond shareholders selling their stakes in the club. This storyline incorporates a direct homage to the 1976 film "All the President's Men," complete with a score reminiscent of the Watergate classic. Mae, a character in the show, adopts the role of Deep Throat, advising Higgins to "follow the anger." While acknowledged as a creative reference, the execution is critiqued for lacking the sharp comedic edge seen in similar parodies on shows like "Parks and Recreation" or "Brooklyn Nine-Nine."

Gemma's Injury and Career Dilemma

The episode also focuses on the character Gemma, who sustains an ACL injury during a game. This setback leads her to reconsider her football career, considering a prestigious law school internship. The narrative explores the difficult choices faced by women's footballers, who often must balance their athletic aspirations with the need for financial stability. The show references the recent introduction of minimum salaries in the WSL 2, a policy implemented to allow players to train and play full-time. However, the episode's script, written before these policies were publicly announced, does not fully integrate them into the players' on-screen realities. Gemma's potential reliance on her wealthy family for financial support is also a point of contention, as the show navigates whether her personal choices or systemic support should be the focus.

The episode concludes with Alice encouraging Gemma to prioritize her passion for football over her fear of injury and financial instability. This storyline is characterized as a common sports movie cliché, where the love of the game is presented as a sufficient motivator to overcome adversity. The review suggests that the show oversimplifies the complex realities faced by professional athletes, particularly in women's football, where financial constraints and career risks are significant factors. The episode's conclusion is seen as prioritizing narrative convenience over a more nuanced portrayal of these challenges, with the author wishing for a deeper exploration of the difficulties faced by the characters.


Sources