Rural Healthcare Access in Northern Ireland Criticized as 'Afterthought'
Campaigners urge cross-departmental action to prevent rural communities from being cut off from vital hospital services.
Healthcare campaigners in Northern Ireland are sounding the alarm that rural lives are being treated as an "afterthought" in health transformation plans. Four hospital campaign groups have jointly penned a "letter of concern" to the Northern Ireland Executive, advocating for a dedicated cross-departmental working group focused on rural health access. They warn that these communities face a "real threat of being cut off from timely access" to essential acute and hospital services.
The proposed creation of a new hospital network, outlined by former Health Minister Mike Nesbitt in 2024, would involve spreading healthcare services across counties, potentially requiring patients to travel further for specialized treatment. The Department of Health has been approached for comment on these concerns.
Donal O'Cofaigh of Save Our Acute Services (SOAS), based in County Fermanagh, emphasized the critical need for executive ministers to collectively consider decisions impacting local hospital services. He stated that it is "vital" that such decisions are not made in isolation. Other groups co-signing the letter include SoS Causeway Hospital group, Save Our Services Daisy Hill, and the Down Community Health committee. These groups have been actively campaigning for years against the removal of acute services in their respective areas.
In their letter, the campaigners argue that past healthcare decisions have often been presented as purely operational or clinical matters, lacking sufficient cross-departmental scrutiny. They are calling for a "presumption of restoration," a mechanism to reinstate services in rural hospitals where they were removed without adequate assessments or scrutiny.
"We cannot accept the situation where our communities are disadvantaged simply because of where they live," O'Cofaigh stated, adding that rural residents currently feel like "second-class citizens" under the existing system.
Campaigners highlight the issue of "unsafe distances," forcing residents to travel significant and potentially hazardous lengths for emergency care during vulnerable times. O'Cofaigh described this as an "outrageous situation" with profound impacts on people's lives, potentially re-entrenching wider disadvantage. He asserted that delays in receiving life-saving treatments due to long travel times lead to different, and often poorer, health outcomes, and that lives are already being lost as a consequence.
The campaigners also contend that rural-proofing of policies is "non-existent," with decisions frequently made without a meaningful assessment of their differential impact on rural communities. They are demanding independent rural-needs and equality assessments, alongside the establishment of the cross-departmental ministerial working group on rural health access.
In September, Health Minister Robbie Butler announced the formation of a new independent expert committee tasked with advising him on major or controversial proposals for permanent changes to health and social care services. The proposed hospital network would maintain a four-tiered model: area hospitals offering comprehensive emergency and planned treatments; general hospitals providing unscheduled care in more isolated areas; local hospitals focusing on community services like diagnostics and mental health support; and regional centers specializing in areas such as stroke, cancer, and neurology to reduce waiting times.