Readers Criticize Hasan Piker's Views on US, Iran, and Nuclear Weapons
A collection of 'Letters to the Editor' express strong disapproval of Twitch streamer Hasan Piker's recent statements, which included claims that the U.S. is worse than al-Qaeda and that Iran should possess nuclear weapons.
Several New York Post readers have voiced sharp criticism of Twitch streamer Hasan Piker's recent public statements, particularly his assertions that the United States has committed more acts of terrorism than al-Qaeda and that Iran should be permitted to develop nuclear weapons. The letters, published on September 22, 2026, largely condemn Piker's views as ignorant, outrageous, and harmful to political discourse.
One letter argues that Iran's support for groups like the Houthis, Hezbollah, and Hamas demonstrates its intent to destabilize the world and points to the country's internal repression of protesters. The author suggests that Piker's statements, which some interpret as pro-Iran and anti-American, receive undue attention.
Another correspondent questions the concept of birthright citizenship in light of Piker's background, noting his parents were Turkish students on visas when he was born in the U.S. before he was raised in Turkey. This letter contends that individuals who criticize the country should not be naturalized or granted citizenship easily, suggesting that Piker's presence as a citizen attacking the U.S. is problematic.
A third letter observes, with a hint of sarcasm, that Piker might be a significant factor in the upcoming midterm elections for the Republican party.
Further criticism comes from a reader who accuses Piker of demonizing the U.S. and Israel while overlooking actions by China, Hamas, and al-Qaeda. This letter emphasizes that Piker benefits from the free speech guaranteed in the U.S., a right not afforded by groups he allegedly favors.
Another reader calls for scrutiny of Piker's Turkish heritage, specifically referencing the historical actions against Armenians and Assyrians. This perspective suggests Piker selectively ignores the violent past of his ancestry while focusing on perceived flaws in American and Israeli history.
The publication also included letters responding to comments by Ed Sheeran regarding Israel's actions in Gaza, with readers debating the complexities of the conflict and the role of Palestinian leadership.