express gazette logo
The Express Gazette
Friday, October 30, 2026

Poland's Government Suspends Top Court Justices Amid Rule of Law Dispute

The government's actions have sparked protests and counter-protests, with riot police deployed outside the Constitutional Tribunal.

US Politics • 2 hours ago
Poland's Government Suspends Top Court Justices Amid Rule of Law Dispute

A political confrontation unfolded in Poland's capital as the government moved to suspend two senior justices of the Constitutional Tribunal and initiate criminal proceedings against them. Justice Minister Waldemar Żurek announced his request to strip the court's President Bogdan Święczkowski and Vice-President Bartłomiej Sochański of their immunity from prosecution.

In response to the government's actions, members of the opposition Law and Justice (PiS) party gathered outside the court premises in Warsaw. Riot police were deployed to maintain order and prevent demonstrators from entering the building.

The Constitutional Tribunal issued a statement asserting that Święczkowski and Sochański remain the legally appointed senior justices and declared that actions taken against them constitute a "coup d'etat."

Prime Minister Donald Tusk stated that his government's actions are aimed at restoring the rule of law. He described the process as difficult and necessary after what he characterized as "years of Law and Justice's lawlessness."

President Karol Nawrocki, who is aligned with PiS, altered his travel plans, with his plane being turned back to Warsaw from a trip to Senegal. Nawrocki had been en route to attend the Summer Youth Olympic Games.

The Constitutional Tribunal has been at the center of Poland's prolonged rule of law dispute since the PiS-led government took power in 2015. At that time, the PiS majority in parliament rapidly appointed judges to the court, aiming to secure a majority given the tribunal's power to review legislation.

Subsequently, rulings from European courts, including the European Court of Human Rights and the Court of Justice of the European Union, found that PiS had improperly appointed three judges, as they were filling positions already validly held by individuals appointed by the previous parliament. These European judgments declared Poland's Constitutional Tribunal no longer an "independent and impartial tribunal."

Prime Minister Tusk's government, which took office in 2023, pledged to depoliticize the judiciary but has faced obstacles in reversing PiS-era changes. These challenges include presidential vetoes from Nawrocki and his predecessor, Andrzej Duda, who are backed by PiS.

Nawrocki has also refused to swear in five Constitutional Tribunal judges elected by parliament since March, citing alleged procedural flaws in their selection. Anna Korwin-Piotrowska, one of these judges, has now been placed in temporary charge of the court.

Earlier in the month, the Venice Commission, the Council of Europe's advisory body on constitutional matters, recommended that Nawrocki swear in the judges to enable them to participate in the court's proceedings.

Justice Minister Żurek defended the move to pursue criminal charges against the tribunal's president and vice-president, stating they should face consequences for not allowing the appointed judges to adjudicate.

Some of Tusk's supporters have criticized his administration for not acting more decisively to dismantle the PiS-era judicial reforms. The upcoming parliamentary elections next year have led some to view Tusk's current actions as a strategic move to improve his popularity.

However, the minister's actions have drawn criticism from legal experts. Lawyer Marcin Matczak, who has been a vocal critic of the PiS-era judicial reforms, stated that the suspension of the court's president lacked legal basis. Matczak expressed concern that the current events could significantly damage the Constitutional Tribunal and the broader issue of the rule of law in Poland for decades, warning of a potential "anti-rule of law backlash" resulting from images of police intervention and ministerial decrees impacting the judiciary.


Sources