Activists seeking to "cancel" the small city of Piedmont, California, are facing criticism for their campaign against the enclave, which is surrounded by Oakland. Piedmont, a city of approximately 11,000 residents, is described by proponents as a functioning example of local democracy, boasting strong schools, clean streets, and engaged residents.
The "Cancel Piedmont" movement is spearheaded by individuals like Jesse Rosemoore, a transit planner who has been selling merchandise associated with the campaign. Critics argue that the movement targets Piedmont due to its success, prosperity, and independence, characteristics that attract families and lead to high property values.
Piedmont has operated as a charter city since 1923, a status that grants its residents the right to elect local leaders, vote on taxes, and hold officials accountable. This right to self-determination is seen by supporters as fundamental, similar to that of any other California city.
The campaign has been characterized as "pure theater" by some, as annexing Piedmont would require a vote by Piedmont residents, a scenario deemed unlikely. Instead, the "cancel" movement relies on protests and slogans without engaging in the practicalities of governance.
Piedmont is subject to California's housing development mandates, including requirements for affordable housing units. Critics of the "cancel" campaign suggest that the city should be judged on its adherence to laws and its ability to meet legal obligations, rather than its existence being perceived as an offense by neighboring communities dealing with their own challenges.
The movement is viewed by some as confusing resentment with reform, arguing that a city that delivers results should be seen as a positive example of what local democracy can achieve, rather than a problem to be eliminated. Piedmont, while not perfect, is presented as an alternative that functions more effectively than the "chaos and excuses" attributed to the neighboring city of Oakland.
Supporters of Piedmont advocate for the city's right to self-governance, suggesting that those critical of its success should instead observe and learn from its model rather than attempting to dismantle it. The debate highlights differing perspectives on urban governance, success, and the role of neighboring communities in challenging established municipalities.