Parents Accuse Labour of Failing Children in Paedophile Case
Families say the party's handling of complaints against nursery worker Vincent Chan reveals systemic failures.
Families affected by the abuse of children by Vincent Chan, a former nursery worker, have accused the Labour party of failing to protect children, both in the past and currently. They contend that the party's response to concerns raised about Chan years before his conviction demonstrates systemic inadequacies.
Vincent Chan was sentenced to 18 years in prison in February after admitting to sexually assaulting and filming young girls in his care. Police suspect the full extent of his offending may never be known, with abuse potentially dating back to at least 2022.
At the time the concerns were initially reported in 2021, Georgia Gould, the current schools minister, was the leader of Camden Council. A parent had raised "significant concerns" about Chan to the nursery, Bright Horizons. According to reports, the nursery escalated these concerns to the local authority, but the council returned them, suggesting the nursery chain handle the matter internally rather than contacting the police. This decision allowed Chan to continue working with children.
Families have expressed dismay that the council did not act, and have criticized Labour figures, including current Camden council leader and Keir Starmer's successor as MP, Sagal Abdi-Wali, for not providing sufficient answers. Gould served as council leader from 2017 until her election as an MP in 2024. Labour maintains that Gould would not have been directly informed about the specific concerns regarding Chan in 2021.
However, one mother stated that the ultimate responsibility lies with leadership, asserting that if the culture within the council led to concerns not being taken seriously, the leader should be held accountable. She expressed concern about an individual overseeing child safety in schools who, in her view, demonstrated an inability to protect children from serious harm within her council role.
Another parent, whose child was also cared for by Chan, echoed these sentiments, arguing that while the issue might not have been on Gould's desk, the local authority, and by extension its leader, bore responsibility. This parent decried the infiltration of nurseries by predators and the failure of Labour institutions to protect children.
A Department for Education spokesperson commented that the ministerial team takes the case and its implications very seriously. The department has implemented enhanced recruitment and safeguarding requirements, developed new safeguarding training, and is creating guidance on digital devices, the use of CCTV in nurseries, and strengthening Ofsted's powers. A Local Child Safeguarding Practice Review, led by an independent reviewer, is underway to identify lessons learned and prevent future incidents.
A spokesperson for Bright Horizons confirmed that they referred a concern about Chan to the local authority in 2021, in line with their safeguarding procedures. They stated that Chan was reassigned to duties without child contact during the investigation. The nursery group expressed regret that Chan's offending was not detected sooner and acknowledged the importance of the independent review.
A Camden Council spokesman indicated that the council wants families to receive the answers they deserve through the independent review. The nursery involved in the case has since closed.