New York Times' Standards Questioned Amidst Anniversary Coverage
An alum criticizes the publication's shift towards activism and partisanship, citing coverage of poverty and income data.

As The New York Times marks its 175th anniversary, a former employee has voiced concerns about the publication's journalistic standards, suggesting a move away from accuracy and fairness towards activism and partisan viewpoints. The critique highlights recent coverage of poverty and income statistics as an example.
In a recent piece, the focus was on the 2025 poverty rate, which remained unchanged at 13.1 percent from the previous year. Despite this statistic, and a record high median household income of $87,460, the article's tone was described as mournful. The New York Times reportedly attributed the lack of a reported decline in poverty to the delayed full effect of "Trump’s awful cuts to the social safety net." The report also cited "analysts and advocates" who predicted worse conditions in future surveys, a perspective the author suggests indicates a desired outcome of negative news and a readiness to attribute it to former President Trump.
This assessment suggests a departure from traditional journalistic practices, where, according to the critique, a focus on objective reporting has been supplanted by a "woke shift" that overshadows historical reporting.