The New York Post's editorial board has criticized several public figures and publications for what it deems "disturbing disinformation and dangerous delusions." The critiques, published this week, target a quote from author Zaina Arafat in New York Magazine, comments from Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, and a proposed travel plan for New York City's first lady.

Criticism of Zionism Statement

The Post took issue with a statement by Zaina Arafat in New York Magazine, which read, "[Arab New Yorkers] still face xenophobia, Islamophobia, and Zionism — along with the repercussions of speaking out against them." The Post's editorial board characterized the assertion that Zionism is something New Yorkers have to "face" as an "outlandish slur," noting that the United Nations rescinded its designation of "Zionism is racism" 35 years ago.

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's Privacy Comments

The editorial board also commented on Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez's response when asked about her relationship status. Ocasio-Cortez stated, "I don’t comment on my private life." The Post found this stance to be in contrast with her public livestreaming of "deeply personal fertility treatments" and hormone injections for egg freezing.

First Lady's Travel Plans

The publication also addressed a reported travel plan for the city's first lady, Rama Duwaji, to visit Syria and Lebanon. A mayoral spokesperson indicated that the first lady's security detail would accompany her upon the recommendation of the NYPD. However, NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch reportedly disputed this, stating that the NYPD would not protect Duwaji on what was described as a "discretionary" trip to regions with a Level 4 "DO NOT TRAVEL" advisory. The Post suggested that if Duwaji proceeds with such travel, she should arrange her own security.

Defense Policy Remarks

Further criticism was leveled at remarks made by Megan Romer, Co-Chair of the Democratic Socialists of America. Romer suggested that Russia's invasion of Ukraine should have been met with "huge teams of diplomats" rather than arms. The Post framed this as the DSA's perspective that diplomatic actions, rather than military aid, should be the response to aggression, calling such solutions "ridiculous."