Mike Tyson's Wife Testifies in $1.5M Ad Campaign Dispute
Lakiha Tyson tells court that a 'ridiculous' proposal involving a giant talking pigeon led to the boxing legend pulling out of a gambling firm's advertising deal.
Mike Tyson was justified in withdrawing from a $1.5 million advertising campaign because the concept of him interacting with a giant talking pigeon was 'ridiculous,' his wife, Lakiha Tyson, testified in London's High Court. Promoters for the Rabona online gaming brand, Medier Ltd., are suing Tyson and his company, Tyrannic LLC, for breach of contract over a sponsorship deal initially agreed for January 2024.
Medier claims Tyson unlawfully backed out of the campaign after it was announced he would face YouTuber-turned-boxer Jake Paul in an exhibition match. The proposed campaign involved Tyson being interviewed by a person dressed as a giant pigeon and teaching the bird to box. Lawyers for Medier argue that Tyson and his company lost interest in the deal once the more lucrative $15 million exhibition fight was confirmed.
However, Tyson and Tyrannic deny breaching the contract. Their defense is that Medier exceeded the agreed-upon terms by requiring Tyson to participate in an online show called 'Talking Pigeons.' Tyson's legal team contends that the performance demanded in the live stream event went 'far beyond the scope' of the contract. The agreement, according to the defense, was limited to Tyson being filmed playing casino games or other 'approved' games from the company's website.
Mrs. Tyson, who has managed her husband's projects for 17 years through Tyrannic LLC, stated that they aim for campaigns to enhance his brand, not make him the 'butt of the joke.' She described the pigeon concept as 'crazy' and 'disrespectful to his brand.' The contract stipulated that Tyson would be filmed playing casino games like slots and poker, or other approved games featured on Rabona's website. The defense asserts that Medier's proposal for a show involving scripted roles, a mascot pigeon, and teaching the bird to box, exceeded these terms.
Medier's barrister, Ali Reza Sinai, countered that Tyson's team was informed about the channel's pigeon mascot and the need for 'viral content,' suggesting the name 'Talking Pigeons' implied interaction with a pigeon. He also argued that Tyson and Tyrannic lost interest due to the more profitable Jake Paul fight, suggesting that participating in Medier's Amsterdam event in July 2024 would conflict with his Netflix deal.
Mrs. Tyson disputed this, stating that the two matters were separate and that they had other sponsors at the time. She characterized Medier's approach as 'amateur hour.' The court heard that Tyson was to receive an installment-based $2 million fee from Medier, of which he was paid nearly $190,000 before their separation.
Mike Tyson, who became the youngest heavyweight champion at age 20 in 1986, has a well-documented fondness for pigeons, detailing in his autobiography how the birds helped him cope with a troubled childhood. He has previously spoken of being terrified of confrontation and entering boxing after an incident involving a man who killed his pet pigeon.
The bout with Jake Paul was initially scheduled for July 20, 2024, but was later postponed to November, with Tyson ultimately losing to Paul. Medier's lawyers argued that Tyson and Tyrannic feared the Amsterdam event would breach his Netflix contract, which restricted pre-fight sponsorships.
Medier's barrister contended that the 'right inference' was that Tyson and Tyrannic sought to avoid conflicts with the Jake Paul fight's promotional terms. However, Tyson's defense maintained that the performance Medier required was outside the contract's scope, and therefore, Tyrannic did not breach the agreement by withdrawing.