Commentary and analysis published on the 25th anniversary of the September 11th terrorist attacks accuse liberal media outlets of spreading misinformation and engaging in a smear campaign against former President Donald Trump and New York City.

One critical assessment points to The New York Times for publishing a story on the anniversary that focused on supposed rampant Islamophobia in Gotham. The article, titled "Islamophobia" and published in a special section dedicated to the 9/11 anniversary, claimed that anti-Muslim prejudice persists, echoing sentiments from the immediate aftermath of the attacks. The author of this assessment disputes this claim, stating that there was no significant wave of Islamophobia after 9/11 and that none exists now. This perspective is contrasted with data from the NYPD indicating that in the first half of 2026, hate crimes targeting Jews constituted a significantly larger percentage of reported incidents than those targeting Muslims, despite Muslims making up a larger portion of the city's population.

The same outlet that published the critical assessment also noted a subsequent article in The New York Times on the following day, which reported on the rise in antisemitism and increased security measures at Jewish institutions. This article cited NYPD Commissioner Jessica Tisch stating that antisemitic hate crimes were up 9 percent year-to-date and that over half of confirmed hate crimes had targeted Jewish New Yorkers. The piece detailed specific incidents of antisemitic vandalism and violence. Notably, the critical assessment highlights that this second article made no mention of Islamophobia, suggesting a journalistic double standard where anti-Jewish acts involved violence and vandalism, while alleged Islamophobia was centered on feelings and suspicions without reported criminal incidents.

Separately, media coverage from outlets including Politico, The Washington Post, and The Hill is criticized for allegedly misrepresenting President Trump's and his allies' remarks concerning the war with Iran. According to the critique, these outlets have falsely suggested that Trump and his team are creating a false parallel between the 9/11 attacks and the ongoing conflict with Iran. The analysis defends the connection, stating that Trump has consistently viewed Iran's pursuit of nuclear weapons as a threat to America and Israel, and that the military action was a reluctant last resort after diplomatic efforts failed. The argument presented is that the conflict with Iran is a continuation of the broader war on terror initiated after 9/11, and that media distortions stem from intentional misinterpretations by those who oppose the war.