A Los Angeles landlord has drawn significant criticism for listing a one-bedroom apartment in Silver Lake for $2,400 per month with a stipulation that prohibits tenants from installing a stove. The rental listing, which specifies "NO stove allowed," has ignited a firestorm on social media and raised questions about its legality under recent California housing regulations.

The apartment, located on North Dillon Street, was posted on the LARentals subreddit, where users questioned whether the restriction violated a new California law. The law, Assembly Bill 628, which took effect on January 1, 2026, mandates that landlords provide working stoves and refrigerators in residential rental units to meet basic habitability standards.

Commenters expressed disbelief at the landlord's requirement, especially given the high rental price. "I can't believe these people have the nerve to charge $2400/month for an apartment that doesn't fully function," one user wrote. "No stove isn't like 'no dishwasher' or 'no washer/dryer in unit.' It's not a nice-to-have amenity. It's a necessity."

Another user pointed out the fundamental issue: "Literally what?? how the how are you supposed to cook?"

The listing also includes a full refrigerator and touts amenities such as hardwood flooring and shared laundry. The apparent ban on a stove is particularly perplexing given the unit is advertised as having a "good sized" kitchen with art deco tiles.

California Assembly Bill 628 includes exceptions for certain types of housing, such as permanent supportive housing, single-room occupancy units, and housing facilities with communal kitchens. However, the Silver Lake listing does not appear to fall under these exemptions.

Some speculated that the landlord might be unaware of the new legislation. Others suggested the unit could still be viable for individuals who do not cook or only need a place to sleep, though this was met with strong opposition. "'Just a place to sleep' for $2400? He’s charging luxury prices for a place that isn’t legally considered habitable," one commenter retorted.

The controversy emerges as Los Angeles's rental market has seen some relief for tenants. Rents in the area decreased to a four-year low late last year, with apartment vacancies reaching their highest point in nearly five years, according to an analysis by the LA Times in January. This softening market has made premium pricing for properties with questionable habitability even more contentious.