express gazette logo
The Express Gazette
Friday, October 30, 2026

Lawyer Marc Elias Linked to Alaska Senate Race Controversy

Allegations surface of a scheme involving a decoy candidate to influence the outcome of the Alaska Senate race, with prominent Democratic lawyer Marc Elias's firm reportedly providing counsel.

US Politics • 2 hours ago
Lawyer Marc Elias Linked to Alaska Senate Race Controversy

Allegations have emerged suggesting a deliberate effort to deceive voters in Alaska's Senate race, with the firm of lawyer Marc Elias reportedly playing a central role. The controversy centers on the placement of a second candidate named Dan Sullivan in the non-partisan primary, a move critics claim was intended to confuse voters and potentially aid challenger Mary Peltola.

Elias Law Group, the firm led by Elias, served as counsel for both Peltola's campaign and the Democratic Senatorial Campaign Committee, according to reporting from The New York Times. The reports indicate that at least one attorney from Elias's firm was involved in recruiting a retired forest service employee, also named Dan Sullivan, to run in the primary. This individual, who had no prior political experience, was reportedly assisted and funded by Democratic operatives and donors associated with the Elias network.

Peltola, who campaigns as an outsider, was allegedly working with Elias's firm, known for intricate political strategies, to execute what is being described as a "quintessential inside-baseball dirty trick." The scheme is further complicated by the fact that the decoy Dan Sullivan is registered as a Republican.

Marc Elias has a long history in political operations. He was involved in hiring Fusion GPS to produce the Steele Dossier, which contained unverified information about Donald Trump. He also represented Black Lives Matter when its nonprofit faced scrutiny over its finances and has been a key figure in litigation and advocacy concerning campaign finance regulations and voting rules changes that have been criticized by some as benefiting Democratic candidates.

Critics argue that the actions described could constitute a federal crime, specifically a conspiracy to deceive the public and undermine the constitutional right to vote. The involvement of Elias, a lawyer often associated with controversial political tactics, has drawn particular attention in this case.


Sources