Lawmakers Warn of 'Trojan Horse' Networks Undermining American Democracy
Members of the House Foreign Affairs Committee allege that foreign adversaries are using activists, non-profits, and social media influencers to amplify hostile messages within the U.S. through covert influence operations.
Members of the House Foreign Affairs Committee are sounding the alarm about a network of activists, non-profits, and social media influencers that they allege are being used as "Trojan horses" to amplify hostile messages from foreign adversaries and undermine American democracy.
The lawmakers describe a modern form of influence operation where ostensibly American voices are funded or exploited by foreign governments and linked actors to push specific narratives. This concern came to a head during a hearing on covert foreign influence operations when CodePink co-founder Medea Benjamin and two other activists entered the room wearing T-shirts supporting the Islamic Republic of Iran and the Communist Party of Cuba. They were subsequently removed by Capitol Police.
"They're coming in, trying to look like one thing, but we know that once they're inside the gates that those doors are going to spring open and there's a whole other motivation for what they're trying to do," said South and Central Asia Subcommittee Chairman Bill Huizenga, R-Mich. He told Fox News Digital that the incident was political theater designed for a broader audience, intended for disruption and amplification on social media to attract attention, donations, and volunteers.
The hearing, titled "Trojan Horses: Covert Foreign Malign Influence Operations in America," focused on concerns that countries like China, Russia, Iran, and Cuba are using these methods to spread propaganda and influence within the U.S. The metaphor of the "Trojan horse" refers to the ancient Greek story where hidden soldiers concealed within a wooden horse infiltrated and destroyed the city of Troy.
Lawmakers argue that the key to combating these influence campaigns is transparency, which involves tracing the money and exposing the funders behind these alleged operations. Rep. Michael Baumgartner, R-Wash., emphasized the need for Americans to understand who is behind messages appearing on social media, in podcasts, or on college campuses.
"The American people need transparency and need to understand what is going on in this public policy discussions and whether it's podcast hosts, certain actors on social media, or things going on our college campuses," Baumgartner said. "We need to know who's behind it and what their motivations are."
Rep. Randy Fine, R-Fla., highlighted social media, influencers, and protests as potential channels for foreign governments to influence American political debate, describing it as "cognitive warfare" that uses information platforms to "poison people's minds and to create division from within."
Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., also pointed to the role of artificial intelligence, suggesting that foreign adversaries can benefit from campaigns that aim to slow down American technological development.
At the core of the discussion are findings from investigations into Neville Roy Singham, an American-born tech tycoon living in Shanghai. According to reports, Singham has funneled significant amounts of money to several U.S.-based non-profits, including CodePink, which lawmakers allege promote communist ideology and destabilize American society. Singham and CodePink have denied taking direction from the Chinese government or receiving funds from the Chinese Communist Party, respectively, stating their activities are based on their own political beliefs.
Federal investigations into alleged financial misconduct by Singham and the organizations he funds are reportedly underway. Lawmakers stress that the origins of political messaging are often not organic and can be supported by foreign entities.
Following their removal from the hearing, CodePink activists continued their public outreach, filming interactions and posting edited videos on social media. Lawmakers maintain that looking beyond the spectacle to identify the financial backers of such activities is crucial for Americans to understand the full scope of influence campaigns.
"This is theater for many of these people," Huizenga said. He urged that through "transparency and disclosure," Americans should understand "not just the what they are doing, but their who is financing them."