Labour MP Stella Creasy has faced criticism for her public praise of a Muslim celebration that featured gender segregation, with critics labeling her actions hypocritical given her history of advocating for women's rights and inclusivity.

Creasy shared a video on social media marking a Muslim calendar celebration, featuring young women in hijabs and niqabs. She described them as "the future optometrists, lawyers, accountants, surgeons and leaders of our community and country" and invited others to attend the event. However, it was later revealed that the main body of the march was a male-only event, with the women participating in a separate parade.

When questioned about the segregation, Creasy confirmed that the women were indeed separated from the main march. This acknowledgment has drawn sharp criticism from those who point to Creasy's previous strong stances against gender-based exclusion. She has been a vocal critic of institutions with male-only memberships, such as the Garrick Club, arguing that such exclusivity is incompatible with modern values and does "neither sex any favours."

Critics have also invoked Creasy's past statements on trans rights and access to safe spaces, suggesting a broader inconsistency in her application of inclusivity principles. The MP's actions are being framed by some as politically opportunistic, particularly in light of the demographics of her constituency, Walthamstow, which has a significant Muslim population.

The controversy unfolds against a backdrop of broader political discussions. The article notes that the Labour party's recent announcement of sanctions on "illegal settlements" in the West Bank is seen by some as an attempt to alleviate pressure on Labour MPs facing challenges from pro-Palestinian groups and other political factions.

This political maneuvering is contrasted with the stated priorities of the current Prime Minister, who pledged to prioritize policies relevant to his working-class constituents, suggesting that issues like the Israeli-Palestinian conflict are not a primary concern for many in his base.

The criticism against Creasy also draws parallels to other Labour MPs, such as Jess Phillips, who faced scrutiny over her handling of issues related to predominantly Muslim rape gangs. These instances are presented as examples of Labour politicians appearing to compromise their principles when confronting potential backlash from specific demographic groups.

Amidst these discussions, recent incidents in Dover and Portsmouth, where masked men clashed with police, have been widely condemned. Critics argue that the same condemnation for such public disorder and segregation should extend to gender segregation, especially from MPs who champion equality. The article concludes by suggesting that Creasy's "gushing approval" of the segregated event falls short of the standards expected from an MP committed to challenging patriarchal structures and ensuring all constituents are treated equally.