express gazette logo
The Express Gazette
Saturday, October 17, 2026

Kremlin Hails Trump Decision to Suspend Russia Sanctions

Russia describes the move as 'historic,' while critics accuse the US President of prioritizing domestic interests over international stability.

US Politics • 3 hours ago
Kremlin Hails Trump Decision to Suspend Russia Sanctions

The Kremlin has praised President Donald Trump's decision to waive imminent sanctions on Russia, calling the move "historic." The sanctions, which were set to target oil and gas exports and were due to take effect imminently, were blocked by an executive order issued late Tuesday. These measures had been intended to significantly damage Russia's war efforts in Ukraine and penalize countries facilitating its financing.

Trump stated that the waiver, which he claimed was championed by the late Senator Lindsey Graham and enacted into law last month, was in the "national interest" of the United States. The decision comes as other nations, including Britain, Germany, and France, are participating in a major military exercise in Poland next month.

Russia's presidential envoy, Kirill Dmitriev, lauded the suspension of the sanctions, also referred to as the Graham Act. He stated on social media that the act could have "effectively brought all economic co-operation between Russia and the United States to a complete halt, inflicting serious damage primarily on the US economy and global markets." Dmitriev expressed that this suspension signifies that "US-Russia economic dialogue will continue and peacemaking efforts will continue."

The White House announced the suspension of the sanctions via its website, noting that a report explaining the decision had been submitted to Congress. Moscow has interpreted the suspension as a sign of US support for its actions in Ukraine.

This development follows a recent incident where Trump suspended sanctions against Russia to secure an initial supply of over 300,000 tons of diesel, with further shipments planned. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky had previously condemned this move, calling it a "gift to Putin" that would enable Russia to "kill more people" and prolong the conflict. Trump responded by suggesting Ukraine needed a "new leader" and later accused Zelensky of being "more difficult to deal with than Putin."

Former UK National Security Adviser Lord Peter Ricketts criticized Trump's actions, suggesting he was seeking to lower diesel prices ahead of the US midterm elections by appealing to Putin. Ricketts asserted that Trump sees Putin as a source for diesel and oil, with Zelensky acting as an obstacle. "He is entirely focused on working with Putin to solve his immediate problem," Ricketts told BBC Radio 4.

The suspended sanctions legislation was designed to curtail Russia's financial resources for its war in Ukraine. It included provisions for up to 100% tariffs on goods from the largest importers of Russian crude oil or gas, sanctions on Russian officials and banks, and penalties for countries knowingly purchasing Russian energy or assisting in evading sanctions, which could have affected nations like China and India.

Senator Richard Blumenthal, a Democrat involved in drafting the legislation, accused Trump of betraying "the majority of Americans, their representatives in both houses of Congress, and our European allies." He argued that the waivers were not related to national security but rather an effort to curry favor with Vladimir Putin.

Amidst lagging poll numbers and low approval ratings, Trump's decision is widely viewed as an attempt to improve his standing before the November midterm elections. Lord Ricketts warned that Trump might blame Putin if election results are unfavorable and that the move poses "a real problem for the Ukrainian people."

Ricketts also expressed concern about potential Russian hybrid attacks in the UK and other European countries, urging the British government to increase defense spending and bolster national resilience in areas such as energy and infrastructure. He stressed the need for parliamentary discussion to secure funding for enhanced protection against what he described as increasingly reckless and dangerous hybrid warfare tactics.


Sources