express gazette logo
The Express Gazette
Sunday, October 25, 2026

Iowa Senate Race: Populism and Bipartisanship Vie for Votes

An open U.S. Senate seat in Iowa becomes a key battleground where Democratic candidate Josh Turek and Republican incumbent Ashley Hinson emphasize different approaches to governance and economic issues.

US Politics • an hour ago
Iowa Senate Race: Populism and Bipartisanship Vie for Votes

The race for an open U.S. Senate seat in Iowa is shaping up as a contest between competing political philosophies, with Republican Rep. Ashley Hinson and Democratic challenger State Rep. Josh Turek each advocating for distinct paths to address the state's economic concerns. The contest takes place in a midterm election environment where Iowa, a state with a strong Republican lean in recent presidential elections, is seen as a competitive opportunity for Democrats.

Turek, a two-time Paralympic gold medalist, is running on what he describes as a "common-sense prairie populist" platform. He has emphasized his personal story, highlighting his experience with spina bifida as a consequence of his father's exposure to Agent Orange during the Vietnam War, framing it as an example of "generational consequences of these forever wars." He told ABC News that voters are expressing fatigue with political division, stating, "I'm struggling to keep food on the table, a roof above my head, pay my electric bill, and keep gas in my tank. Can you please go up there and solve problems through policy in a bipartisan way?"

Turek has also voiced support for some of Donald Trump's policies, including border security, and has expressed a desire to drive private equity out of housing, healthcare, and nursing homes. He has also aligned with Trump on proposals for tax exemptions on tips, overtime, and Social Security. Turek has formed a coalition of Republican supporters, including members of his family, underscoring his bid to appeal across party lines.

Conversely, Hinson, seeking to become one of the youngest elected Republican women in the U.S. Senate, is pitching herself as a bipartisan lawmaker who can deliver results for Iowa. Despite an initial campaign promise to be Trump's "strongest ally," she has stated she is unafraid to disagree with the former president. "I think that's how Iowans expect you to do your job. They don't like empty rhetoric. They like results here in Iowa, and that's exactly what I've done," Hinson told ABC News.

Hinson has criticized Trump's recent dealings with Russia and has voiced opposition to what she called "deals with murderers and dictators," specifically referencing the U.S. Special Envoy's remarks about Russian President Vladimir Putin. She has also defended the Republican tax legislation, referred to as the "One Big Beautiful Bill," arguing it provides tax relief for families. She has pledged to pursue further action to lower healthcare premiums and gas prices. Hinson highlighted instances where she found common ground with President Biden on issues beneficial to Iowa while she was in the minority party.

Democrats see an opportunity in Iowa due to economic discontent, particularly concerning rising gas and fertilizer costs. A recent CNN poll indicated that a majority of likely Iowa voters believe Trump's policies have increased their cost of living, that gas prices have caused hardship, and that tariffs are detrimental to the state. Turek has criticized Hinson's votes supporting the ongoing conflict with Iran, while simultaneously touting his own bipartisan credentials and promising to work across the aisle.

Hinson, who faces scrutiny for her stance on various issues including trade and foreign policy, has pointed to her work in Congress. Turek, whose campaign has drawn support from figures such as former President Barack Obama, emphasizes a pragmatic approach to governance, aiming to bridge partisan divides in a state where Republicans currently hold significant political power, including the governorship and majorities in the state legislature. He has also critiqued the GOP's tax legislation, arguing it has negatively impacted rural hospitals and healthcare access.


Sources