Hunt Urges Public Sector Reform Over Tax Hikes for UK Economy
Former Chancellor Jeremy Hunt argues that reducing public sector inefficiency is a more viable path to fiscal health than increasing taxes, which he claims harm businesses and growth.

Former Chancellor Jeremy Hunt has advocated for significant reforms within the British public sector as a means to address the nation's fiscal challenges, arguing that increased taxation would be detrimental to economic growth. Hunt contends that the public sector, which accounts for 20% of the UK's economic output, is rife with inefficiencies that, if tackled, could generate substantial savings.
Speculation surrounding the upcoming budget has largely focused on potential tax increases, with families and businesses reportedly bracing for further financial burdens. Hunt highlighted that an estimated half of the £22 billion budget headroom inherited by Chancellor John Healey has been eroded by rising borrowing costs. He asserts that any remaining buffer should be preserved rather than allocated to new spending, which would necessitate either tax hikes or spending cuts.
Hunt criticized recent tax policies implemented by the Labour government, particularly increases in employers' national insurance contributions, which he believes have stifled job creation and harmed entrepreneurs. He suggested that these taxes, which form a significant portion of government revenue, could be avoided if the government pursued greater efficiency in its £1.4 trillion annual spending.
"The first rule of any Chancellor should be ‘Do No Harm’," Hunt stated, emphasizing the damage he believes Labour's tax policies have inflicted on businesses. He pointed to the Civil Service, noting its expansion by a third in the last decade, and proposed a return to 2019 staffing levels, a move he estimated could save £2.9 billion annually. This plan, he claimed, was abandoned by the current government shortly after they took office.
Further savings, according to Hunt, could be realized by reforming the welfare system. He proposed tackling the working-age benefit bill, suggesting that bringing it down to 2019 levels in real terms could save £58 billion a year within five years. Hunt also called for an end to telephone benefit assessments to combat fraud and error, which he stated cost the country £9.3 billion annually, including fraudulent claims from overseas.
Additionally, Hunt identified opportunities for savings in areas such as the student finance system, citing a post-Brexit scheme being exploited by non-UK nationals, which he believes results in an annual loss of up to £2 billion on student loans. He also pointed to the Ministry of Defence's £1.6 billion loss from project cancellations, as well as significant losses from canceled road projects and the Rwanda scheme.
Hunt suggested that making the public sector just one percent more efficient annually could save £6 billion, a sum that could contribute to increasing defense spending to three percent of GDP. He drew parallels to his own experience as Health Secretary, where a drive for procurement efficiency in NHS trusts reportedly saved around £300 million annually. He criticized recent public sector pay rises, arguing that above-inflation increases should be conditional on equivalent productivity improvements.
"Reforming the public sector isn’t easy," Hunt acknowledged, referencing past industrial actions. "But when the alternative to doing so is taxing the life out of the economy, it isn’t difficult to work out what would be better."