Republican senators are voicing concern that President Donald Trump's demand to cancel the August recess could negatively impact the party's prospects in the upcoming midterm elections. The push centers on passing the stalled SAVE America Act and a $95 billion Pentagon bill related to the Iran conflict before the scheduled summer break.
Some Republicans argue that canceling the recess, which is crucial for campaigning and engaging with voters, is a misstep that could cost the party seats. Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C., described the idea as "tone-deaf," drawing a parallel to the 2020 elections where, he contended, a similar approach contributed to losses.
However, a faction within the GOP supports remaining in Washington until the SAVE America Act is passed, even suggesting measures like budget reconciliation or eliminating the filibuster to achieve this. This creates a difficult situation for incumbents, particularly those in vulnerable districts, who must choose between adhering to Trump's demand or returning home to campaign.
Several Republican senators acknowledge that the SAVE America Act lacks sufficient votes for passage in its current form, and remaining in Washington may not sway opposing senators. Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, who is retiring, stated that if he were running for re-election, he might reconsider his position on staying in session. He suggested that canceling recess would be an "act of futility" if it doesn't change the outcome.
Senators Jon Husted, R-Ohio, and Dan Sullivan, R-Alaska, both in closely contested races, have indicated they are actively advocating for the SAVE America Act. Sullivan deferred comment on the recess cancellation, while Husted emphasized the importance of being in his home state with constituents, though he also acknowledged his senatorial duties. "But I also have a job here, and if the job requires me to be here, then I'll be here," Husted said.
Sen. Roger Marshall, R-Kan., expressed willingness to stay an extra week or two but not for an extended period if it wouldn't alter the legislative outcome. He also recognized the challenge of returning to constituents without passing the legislation, noting that the "base would be mad if we don't make the best effort possible to get this voter ID across the finish line."