Rep. August Pfluger, R-Texas, chairman of the Republican Study Committee, stated that the WNBA's response to congressional inquiries regarding the treatment and safety of player Caitlin Clark "falls short" and indicated that lawmakers are considering "every option on the table." The WNBA Commissioner Cathy Engelbert formally responded on July 24 to a letter from Pfluger and 10 other House Republicans, which questioned the league's measures to protect Clark and hold opposing players accountable for overly physical play.

In the league's two-page response, Engelbert asserted that the WNBA's "top priority is the health, safety, and well-being of every player in our league, including Caitlin Clark." She detailed the league's standard procedures for reviewing officiating and potentially dangerous play, but did not address the specific incidents involving Clark that were cited by the lawmakers. Pfluger criticized this approach, stating, "We didn’t request a description of the league’s general officiating and disciplinary procedures, we asked how those procedures have actually been applied in the specific incidents we raised involving Caitlin Clark, and the league chose not to answer that."

Engelbert outlined that the WNBA Basketball Operations and Referee Operations conduct separate post-game reviews to examine "atypical or overly physical plays" and evaluate officiating performance. These reviews can lead to escalated fouls, fines, suspensions, or other disciplinary actions, and are used to inform future officiating training. "In all instances, the League seeks to apply the WNBA rulebook and applicable disciplinary processes consistently across all games and for all players," the commissioner wrote.

Pfluger countered that the league provided no evidence to support its claim of consistent rule application. "Saying you apply your rules ‘consistently across all games and for all players’ is an assertion, not evidence, and it’s the league’s burden to show that, not ours to assume it," he stated. "Until the WNBA is willing to engage with the specifics of our information requests instead of simply restating their own policies back to us, our concerns remain unaddressed."

The initial letter from the lawmakers, sent on July 7, highlighted several public incidents involving Clark, including instances where she was reportedly hip-checked, poked in the eye, and struck in the throat. The league later issued a Flagrant Foul 2 and a one-game suspension to Phoenix Mercury forward Alyssa Thomas for the throat-contact incident on June 24. The lawmakers argued these incidents went "far beyond routine physical play" and suggested a failure by the league and its officials to adequately address such conduct.

The congressional letter also expressed concern over reports suggesting that some of Clark's treatment could be racially motivated, warning that a failure to prevent discrimination or a hostile work environment could raise questions under federal workplace and civil rights laws. The lawmakers requested a response by July 24, a deadline Engelbert met. However, her response did not address the alleged racial motivation, discuss specific plays involving Clark, or provide comparative data on how disciplinary procedures have been applied to different players.

Engelbert's response also addressed the league's efforts to enhance off-court security, detailing investments in arena and travel security, charter flights, technology for identifying online threats, stricter fan conduct policies, and expanded mental health resources. This emphasis followed a joint statement from the WNBA and the Women's National Basketball Players Association regarding an increase in hateful messages directed at players.

Pfluger reiterated that the core of the lawmakers' inquiry was about the application of in-game rules and accountability for physical play, separate from off-court harassment issues. He maintained that the burden of proof lies with the WNBA to demonstrate fair enforcement of its standards to maintain confidence in the league's governance.

While Pfluger did not specify the next congressional action, his commitment to keeping "every option on the table" suggests potential for further information requests or scrutiny. "Women’s sports are at a turning point," Pfluger said. "How the WNBA treats its own biggest star will show whether the league is actually committed to protecting the players carrying it forward."