Former DOGE Lead Counters Negative Portrayals of Musk, Team
An ex-Interior Department official defends the controversial initiative's efforts to cut wasteful spending and improve efficiency, pushing back against media narratives.
A former official involved in the Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE) initiative has challenged the prevailing media narrative surrounding the program and its leader, Elon Musk. Tyler Hassen, who served as Acting Assistant Secretary for Policy, Management and Budget at the Department of the Interior and led its DOGE efforts, stated in a recent account that his experience within the group was largely misrepresented by mainstream news outlets.
Hassen, who is also the author of the book "Inside DOGE," asserted that the team did not indiscriminately cut programs. Instead, he described a process where thousands of contracts and grants were reviewed with the objective of identifying and eliminating wasteful or non-mission-critical spending. "Defend the spend" and "mission critical" were the guiding questions posed to those familiar with the programs, aiming to ensure taxpayer dollars were used prudently.
Contrary to accusations of disrespecting career civil servants, Hassen expressed significant respect for the individuals working within the government. He attributed the friction experienced by the team not to the people themselves, but to systemic issues such as inefficient organizations, outdated technology, and a lack of accountability that trapped many capable individuals.
"What shocked me wasn't the people—it was the system around them: the inefficient organizations, the decades-old technology, and the near-total absence of accountability," Hassen wrote. "Many good people were trapped inside a machine built to resist common sense."
The initiative's team, which Hassen highlighted included approximately 20 women and younger engineers he described as "brightest people in this country," faced media hostility. He defended these individuals, many of whom left lucrative private-sector opportunities to contribute to the effort out of a sense of patriotism.
Hassen also offered a defense of Elon Musk's leadership style. He recounted observing Musk's intense focus on problem-solving, even working long hours and sleeping on-site. Hassen characterized Musk's approach as relentless, respectful, and driven by a belief that an economically unstable America cannot effectively address its own challenges or global issues.
"I saw a man so locked in on the problem that he sometimes slept on the floor in a nearby office," Hassen stated. "In our meetings, two things struck me that I'll never forget: his ability to be completely present with a problem until it was solved, and a sense of urgency so strong that everyone in the room felt it."
He noted that the senior team, including individuals like Steve Davis, James Burnham, Anthony Armstrong, Josh Gruenbaum, and Stephen Ehikian, shared a similar dedication. Hassen suggested that the team's motivation stemmed from a genuine desire to improve the nation's fiscal health, particularly in light of the substantial national debt.
Despite not achieving all its initial goals, Hassen argued that the DOGE experience demonstrated the significant potential for improvement within government operations and the capacity of dedicated individuals to identify and resolve issues. He advocated for learning from the initiative rather than dismissing it as a failure.
"Because our national debt problem still exists. I don't want my daughter growing up in a country carrying $100 trillion in debt and paying trillions every year just in interest—money that could otherwise be used to improve our country—or, better yet, stay in your pocket," Hassen wrote.
He concluded by endorsing efforts like the task force announced by Vice President JD Vance to eliminate fraud and stressed the necessity of bipartisan cooperation for meaningful spending reform. Hassen offered his own assistance for future efforts in this area.