Former Republican National Committee spokesman Tim Miller said Friday that recent episodes of the animated satire South Park, which have mocked former President Donald Trump, appear to be influencing MAGA-friendly comedians and could have political consequences for parts of the president’s base.

Miller, a writer-at-large at the anti-Trump conservative site The Bulwark, told MSNBC host Nicolle Wallace that the program has a "trickle down" effect on what he described as "manosphere-type comedians," naming Tim Dillon and Andrew Schulz. "The 'South Park' and the Tim Dillons starting to poke fun at these guys, I think could have a real political impact because it might pop the bubble of invincibility that Trump has had with some part of his base," Miller said.

Miller framed the phenomenon as part of shifting attitudes in online male-focused communities. He said those in the "manosphere," which he characterized as a network of right-leaning, male-focused comedians, influencers and podcasters, "want to be outsiders" but are "starting to get pretty skeptical" about the administration. He suggested that satire from established cultural outlets can filter into the rhetoric and attitudes of influential online comedians and podcasters.

Miller pointed specifically to Tim Dillon, who has interviewed conservative figures including U.S. Sen. J.D. Vance and whose commentary reaches a sizable online audience. Since the Season 27 premiere of South Park, Miller said, Dillon has been more openly critical, at times describing the administration as "an auction" up for bids from other countries.

Andrew Schulz, another comedian Miller mentioned, is known for his standup and podcast work and has been cited by Miller as part of the broader cohort of performers and commentators whose tone may be shifting. Miller did not provide polling data to quantify the alleged change in sentiment among Trump supporters; his comments were presented as analysis during the televised interview.

South Park, which has for decades used satire to lampoon public figures across the political spectrum, has periodically drawn attention for its portrayals of contemporary politics. Miller’s remarks reflect a broader debate about how cultural media and internet personalities affect political opinion, particularly within engaged segments of a political movement.

Miller’s comments came amid ongoing scrutiny of the influence of online comedians and podcasters on public discourse. He framed the potential impact as incremental rather than immediate, arguing that ridicule from mainstream satirists could erode a perceived aura of invulnerability among some supporters over time.

The extent to which satirical programming and internet-era comedians will alter voting behavior or core political loyalties remains uncertain. Miller said the developments merit attention given the role that comedians and influencers can play in shaping conversations among their audiences.

Miller made the remarks on MSNBC’s "Deadline: White House" with Nicolle Wallace. He is a former RNC spokesperson who now writes for The Bulwark, a publication that has frequently criticized Trump and his allies.