A woman facing an inoperable lung cancer diagnosis is grappling with the decision of whether to reconnect with her estranged daughter and grandchildren. The woman, who has had her cancer spread to her lymph nodes and a bone, has been out of contact with her daughter for two years following a significant family dispute.

Despite her efforts to mend the rift, the daughter severed ties with her mother and two sisters, including her husband and adult children. The mother has spent months in distress over the estrangement and is now hesitant to inform her daughter about her illness, fearing the daughter might return out of pity rather than genuine reconciliation. She also considers that her daughter and her family initiated the estrangement and might prefer to learn of the diagnosis after her passing. However, she is concerned about the impact on her other two daughters.

Relationships counselor Caroline West-Meads of YOU Magazine acknowledges the commonality of family estrangement and the mother's understandable reluctance to reopen old wounds. West-Meads suggests that individuals who cut ties often operate under the assumption that there will always be future opportunities for amends, which can lead to profound regret upon a loved one's death. The counselor's instinct is to inform the daughter, thereby offering her and the grandchildren the choice to respond, rather than denying them that option.

Recognizing the potential for an unpredictable and painful reaction from the daughter, West-Meads strongly recommends seeking support beforehand. Organizations like Macmillan Cancer Support and Marie Curie are suggested for assistance in navigating this situation, including how and when to communicate with other grandchildren, as research indicates that earlier disclosure can reduce long-term distress.

If the decision is made to contact the daughter, West-Meads advises a simple and unemotional approach, possibly through a short letter or email. Such a message might state an understanding of the daughter's desire for no contact, express sadness over the estrangement, and inform her of the cancer diagnosis and poor prognosis. The message would emphasize that the mother wanted her daughter to have the choice to engage before it is too late, expressing continued love and an open door for communication, suggesting that the past can be left behind.

Resources such as rejectedparents.net, run by Sheri McGregor, and Dr. Josh Coleman's book "Rules of Estrangement: Why Adult Children Cut Ties and How to Heal the Conflict" are also recommended for support regarding estrangement.

In a separate query, a 43-year-old woman sought advice after her ex-partner of eight years suddenly returned to Australia two years ago, citing a lack of job opportunities and leaving behind a financial mess. He has recently contacted her, stating he will be in England next month and wishes to see her, mentioning unhappiness in Australia. The woman wishes to see him, primarily to confront him about his past treatment, but remains angry and hurt.

West-Meads advised against the meeting, suggesting that seeing him would likely achieve little and could even inflate his ego, given his past behavior. The counselor recommended the adage 'the best revenge is living well,' advising the woman to inform him she is too busy to meet. Legal advice regarding the unresolved financial issues was also suggested, with a reminder that he might owe her money. The Law Society is a resource for finding legal representation.