Delphi Murders Convict Claims Mental Crisis Led to False Confessions
Richard Allen's attorneys argue his confessions to killing two teenage girls were unreliable due to a severe psychological breakdown in prison.
Richard Allen, convicted in the 2017 Delphi murders, is seeking to overturn his conviction, with his defense attorneys arguing that his repeated confessions to killing 13-year-old Abigail Williams and 14-year-old Liberty German were made during a severe psychological crisis.
Allen, 54, is currently serving a 130-year sentence for the murders. His legal team presented arguments before the Indiana Court of Appeals on Monday, asserting that Allen's confessions were unreliable due to his deteriorating mental state in prison.
The case gained national attention following the discovery of a chilling video recorded by Liberty German on her cellphone. The grainy footage captured a man's voice instructing the girls, "Down the hill." Prosecutors used this video, along with an unspent cartridge found between the victims and allegedly cycled through Allen's handgun, as key evidence.
Allen was arrested in October 2022, more than five years after the girls disappeared during a walk near the Monon High Bridge in Delphi. Their bodies were found the following day, with their throats slashed. Some of the initial trial evidence included testimony from prison employees who stated Allen confessed to the murders. One witness recounted Allen saying, "I, Richard Matthew Allen, killed Abby and Libby by myself." Another stated Allen described planning to sexually assault the girls before panicking and killing them.
However, Allen's defense attorneys now contend that his prolonged isolation and the conditions of his solitary confinement contributed to a significant psychological breakdown. They argue that his mental deterioration led him to believe he had committed the murders, a condition they describe as psychosis at the time some confessions were made. The defense also highlighted that jurors were not fully informed about Allen's mental state and pointed to a police sketch of a suspect seen near the trail that did not resemble Allen.
Prosecutors dispute these claims, maintaining that Allen's confessions were genuine and pointing to the timing of his statements, arguing that he began making admissions before exhibiting more extreme behavior observed later in prison. Videos of Allen's unusual behavior in prison were presented during the trial. Appeals judges questioned why the audio accompanying these videos, in which Allen reportedly claimed to be a king and to have started World War III, was not permitted to be played. The judges also questioned why a defense expert's testimony regarding the traceability of marks on the unfired bullet was excluded and why the suspect sketch was omitted from trial.
Allen's lawyers have also challenged other evidence presented at trial and suggested that jurors should have been permitted to consider an alternative theory involving unknown perpetrators and an alleged Norse pagan ritual. The appeals court has not yet ruled on whether Allen will be granted a new trial.