Cornell Faces Growing Pressure Over Handling of 2024 Sexual Assault Allegations
Students and faculty demand accountability and procedural changes following a civil lawsuit detailing an alleged fraternity assault and the university's response.

Students and faculty at Cornell University are increasing their pressure on the administration to address its handling of an alleged gang rape by fraternity members in 2024. Demonstrations, organized under the banner of “Justice for Survivors,” have seen hundreds of students and faculty gather, wearing purple ribbons and holding signs calling for greater accountability and an overhaul of investigatory procedures.
Student organizations, including Students for a Democratic Cornell (SDC), led the protest, presenting demands for disciplinary action and changes to how the university handles sexual assault complaints. Chants included calls for Cornell President Michael Kotlikoff to resign and for fraternities to be banned from campus.
This renewed outrage stems from a civil lawsuit filed in September 2026 by a former student, identified as Jane Doe. The lawsuit alleges that she was sexually assaulted by seven members of the school’s Chi Phi fraternity. Doe also claims that Cornell was negligent in its response to the incident and violated New York law. The lawsuit has brought scrutiny to Cornell’s broader approach to sexual assault reports.
Protesters cite what they consider insufficient punishments following Cornell's Title IX investigation, which began in January 2025. Doe's attorney, Thomas Giuffra, stated that Cornell expelled two of the accused students and required others to write essays. Cornell has confirmed expulsions and suspensions but has not disclosed individual outcomes, clarifying that no students were solely assigned essays as a consequence.
Giuffra also claims Doe was denied a tuition refund when she sought to leave Cornell, eventually withdrawing due to a perceived lack of institutional support. While Cornell stated it works with students seeking leave and has provided refunds in the past, the university did not directly address Doe's specific accusation. Doe has reportedly received threats since filing her lawsuit, with her attorney stating that individuals are attempting to locate her and silence her.
The alleged assault, according to Doe's lawsuit, involved illegal drug use. The Cornell Daily Sun reported that campus police made a drug-related arrest at the Chi Phi fraternity house less than 24 hours before the alleged assault, referring an individual to the student conduct office. The timeline of when the conduct office was informed of this referral remains unclear.
In addition to the protests, dissatisfaction was visible through vandalism at the university's main administration building. A spokesperson for Cornell acknowledged community frustration but stated that damaging property is not an acceptable response, adding that the university is investigating the vandalism.
Faculty members are also expressing concerns. A no-confidence resolution against the central administration's ability to address sexual assault crises was introduced for review by the University Faculty Committee. The resolution is expected to be voted on by the faculty Senate on October 14. While not legally binding, it signifies a formal expression of distrust.
Beyond campus, the case has generated widespread anger and solidarity on social media, with an "I am Jane Doe" online campaign gaining traction. Alumni have launched a petition with over 61,000 signatures pledging to withhold financial support until the university demonstrates accountability and transparency.
Organizing groups have called for Cornell to expel or revoke degrees of those involved in the alleged assault, establish independent hearings with minimum sanctions for sexual assault, mandate prevention training, and commission an external review of the case. They also advocate for restoring a university judicial system independent of the administration, which they believe was compromised when disciplinary authority was placed in administrative hands in 2020.
Cornell’s Board of Trustees has appointed Sally Yates, former acting U.S. attorney general, to lead an independent review of the university’s handling of the case. The review will examine policies, practices, and resources related to the prevention and response of sexual assault, including investigations, support for students, and oversight of student organizations.
Parallel to the university's internal review, a state investigation is ongoing. The Tompkins District Attorney reopened the criminal investigation, though New York Governor Kathy Hochul has criticized the DA's initial handling of the complaint and appointed State Attorney General Letitia James as special prosecutor.
Protests are continuing, with a sit-in planned and an external protest organized by unaffiliated groups scheduled for October 13, demanding answers and accountability from the Cornell administration.