California voters are facing a pivotal decision in the 2026 election, with a stark choice presented between continuing on a path of perceived decline or embracing pragmatic change. The New York Post argues that the state is currently over-regulated, over-taxed, and grappling with an out-of-control homelessness crisis, attributing these issues to 16 years of one-party Democratic rule.
The publication endorses Republican gubernatorial candidate Steve Hilton, characterizing him as a candidate who brings urgency and common-sense solutions. Hilton's proposed policies include canceling high-speed rail, eliminating income taxes on the first $150,000 of income, ending "cap-and-invest" and the "war on fossil fuels," lowering the gas tax, and addressing homelessness by moving individuals into treatment rather than offering conditional housing. He also advocates for cutting brush on state lands, building reservoirs, easing restrictions on single-family home construction, focusing on educational basics, protecting girls' sports, and enforcing laws against criminals.
Conversely, the New York Post criticizes Democratic gubernatorial candidate Xavier Becerra as an "accidental candidate, a do-nothing, low-energy politico" whose proposed solutions, like additional taxes, would exacerbate the cost-of-living crisis. The outlet also dismisses the platforms of Democratic Socialists of America, specifically mentioning Nithya Raman, as radical and lacking common sense, potentially leading to further decline.
In the Los Angeles mayoral race, the New York Post suggests that incumbent Mayor Karen Bass, despite her flaws, is a more viable option than radical alternatives. The publication notes Bass's efforts, such as cutting red tape for wildfire victims, and contrasts her with candidates like Nithya Raman, whom it criticizes for wanting to fire the LAPD chief and protect homeless encampments.
The election also features 14 ballot initiatives. The New York Post specifically endorses a "yes" vote on Proposition 39, the Voter ID initiative, to restore trust in elections. It recommends a "no" vote on Proposition 40, the "billionaire tax," arguing it would drive entrepreneurs out of the state. The publication frames these choices as steps toward a more pragmatic and less radical future for California.