California Neighborhoods Flourish by Focusing on Local Basics, Experts Say
While some Los Angeles areas struggle, smaller cities like Downey are experiencing economic growth and improved quality of life by prioritizing community needs over partisan politics.
While many residents perceive Los Angeles as being in a downward spiral, certain neighborhoods and adjacent cities are demonstrating success through a focus on essential local services and community well-being. These areas, often characterized by predominantly Hispanic or Asian populations, are achieving lower crime rates, higher retail occupancy, and more jobs than parts of the city of Los Angeles itself.
This phenomenon is particularly evident in smaller cities south of Los Angeles, including Downey, Cerritos, Lakewood, South Gate, and Paramount. These communities have reportedly recovered from past difficulties by concentrating on fundamental issues rather than large-scale government intervention. According to a study by Chapman University economist Bheki Mahlobo, these cities have outperformed neighboring areas of Los Angeles.
Downey, sometimes referred to as "the Latino Beverly Hills," serves as a key example. Former mayor Mario Trujillo stated that residents are drawn to the area because they feel safe, migrating from other parts of Los Angeles seeking an improved quality of life. This success, he noted, is partly due to local Republicans and Democrats setting aside partisan differences to address resident priorities.
Mario Guerra, a veteran city council member in Downey, emphasized a community-driven approach. "We had to reinvent ourselves," Guerra said, "But we don’t let partisan politics get in the way. People here back each other up. We all want the streets clean, and the graffiti gone."
These thriving communities prioritize practical solutions, such as readily available apps for reporting graffiti and prompt official responses. In contrast, reports of graffiti in the city of Los Angeles can take weeks or longer to be addressed. The proximity of local politicians to their constituents is cited as a factor in their responsiveness. "It’s harder to shirk public duties when local politicians live among the people who elect them," one council member observed.
The focus extends to tangible improvements like maintaining parks, public spaces, and landscaping, with some cities even subsidizing elements like flower beds and white picket fences. This contrasts with the perceived lack of focus, will, or resources in larger cities like Los Angeles, which historically tended to urban gardens.
Former Paramount city manager Pat West suggested that in cities where local officials reside, "people get things done." He contrasted this with larger cities where, in his view, "they have meetings."
This closer relationship between government and residents fosters a focus on the well-being of families and neighbors, rather than abstract concepts often emphasized by non-governmental organizations. The article contrasts this with what it describes as "progressive" cities, citing Los Angeles's Skid Row as an example of policies that allegedly nurture poverty. Residents of communities like Downey are described as being more directly affected by local governance and therefore more invested in its success.
Even in areas facing challenges, such as the fire-ravaged Pacific Palisades, community-led initiatives are emerging. Stakeholders are reportedly working together to revitalize the neighborhood, suggesting that progress is possible without solely relying on city government. The author advocates for community self-determination, encouraging residents to take a more active role in shaping their neighborhoods rather than passively accepting impositions from above.