express gazette logo
The Express Gazette
Tuesday, October 6, 2026

California High School Football Team Forfeits Four Wins Over Player Eligibility Ruling

Garces Memorial High School is forced to vacate victories after CIF reverses eligibility for two transferred star players.

US Politics • 2 hours ago
California High School Football Team Forfeits Four Wins Over Player Eligibility Ruling

Garces Memorial High School in Bakersfield has forfeited four of its five wins this season following a California Interscholastic Federation (CIF) Central Section ruling that declared two star players ineligible. The decision impacts the football team's record and its previously promising season.

The CIF Central Section reversed its initial decision to grant eligibility to brothers Carter and Bryce Hanson, who transferred from rival Liberty High School during the offseason. This reversal has led to the forfeiture of four victories, reducing the team's on-field record from 5-0 to 1-5.

Junior running back Carter Hanson, a highly recruited prospect with over a dozen NCAA Division I offers, including from UCLA and Arizona, had amassed 400 yards and five touchdowns in five games for Garces. His senior brother, Bryce, a defensive back committed to Southern Utah, recorded eight tackles and two interceptions in the same period.

Initially, the CIF cleared both brothers to play on August 17, classifying their transfer as a "valid change of residency." However, this approval was revoked on Monday morning, changing their eligibility status to "denied" for the remainder of the football season.

The ruling, based on CIF Bylaw 202, requires Garces to forfeit wins against Tehachapi, Wasco, Fresno-San Joaquin Memorial, and North High School. The Hanson brothers had participated in all five of the team's non-league games.

Despite the player ineligibility, Garces secured its sole official win of the season by defeating Bakersfield High School 20-16. The team's only on-field loss occurred in its season opener against Santa Maria-St. Joseph.

The controversy highlights the CIF's stringent transfer eligibility requirements, which govern when student athletes can compete after changing schools. Bylaw 202 mandates that all submitted information regarding a student's eligibility must be accurate, and it warns of consequences, including up to 24 months of athletic ineligibility, for providing false or incomplete information.

While families and schools must submit documentation to establish eligibility, the CIF has not publicly specified the exact details that led to the reversal of the Hanson brothers' case. The forfeit of wins and the ineligibility of key players have significantly impacted the Garces Rams' season as they prepare for their next game.


Sources