Xavier Becerra, a candidate for California governor, has not engaged with the media for approximately two months, a period marked by repeated avoidance of reporters. This lack of direct engagement has drawn criticism, with opponents suggesting it constitutes a disregard for voters and democratic principles.
The candidate's current approach has been compared to the campaign tactics employed by President Joe Biden in 2020, which involved limited public appearances and scripted interactions. Critics argue that a healthy democracy requires candidates to be accessible to the media and the electorate, allowing for open dialogue and scrutiny of their platforms and past actions.
Becerra is reportedly consulting with political advisors, union leaders, and special interest groups as he prepares for the election. Some observers suggest that Becerra might be relying on California's predominantly Democratic voter registration and union support to secure victory, potentially minimizing the perceived need for extensive public campaigning or media engagement.
This period of media silence coincides with lingering questions from Becerra's tenure in Washington. Specifically, inquiries have been raised regarding the whereabouts of approximately 130,000 migrant children who were reportedly lost track of after being permitted to enter the country. Additionally, questions persist about Becerra's knowledge of a business deal that allegedly facilitated the transfer of a trusted aide to Washington.
These issues, according to critics, are not diminished by Becerra's current media avoidance. The argument is made that public office is earned through engagement, including responding to media inquiries and actively seeking votes from the populace. A candidate who remains inaccessible, it is suggested, may win an election but may lack a strong mandate for significant action, particularly when carrying unresolved questions from previous public service.