California gubernatorial candidate Xavier Becerra is facing criticism for not providing detailed policy proposals, a move his detractors suggest could prevent voters from holding him accountable if elected. This approach has been attributed to Becerra's confidence in a state where Democrats significantly outnumber Republicans, diminishing the perceived political risk of not outlining specific commitments.
Becerra has stated that he learned from past political missteps, citing his career change on the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). He campaigned against NAFTA but later voted in favor of it once in office. He reportedly regretted this decision when the agreement's impact on job losses became apparent and unpopular.
Some observers contend that making difficult decisions and potentially being wrong is part of public service, emphasizing the importance of learning to correct mistakes. The argument is that only individuals who avoid significant actions make no errors.
Critics also describe Becerra as having been a secondary figure throughout his career, including his time in Congress, as a temporary California attorney general, and as Secretary of Health and Human Services under President Joe Biden. His current gubernatorial candidacy emerged as a prominent option for Democrats after another candidate withdrew.
This strategy of avoiding offense, while potentially beneficial for career advancement, is viewed by some as a poor method for effective governance. The core criticism is that a candidate must be willing to confront tough choices and have the courage to face potential failure, as well as the ability to adapt.
Furthermore, the expectation is that candidates owe voters a clear understanding of their positions to enable accountability. The current political climate in California, according to this perspective, necessitates leadership, and candidates should be transparent about their readiness for the role.