express gazette logo
The Express Gazette
Wednesday, September 30, 2026

Bank of England Governor: AI Regulation Should Not Be the First Step

Andrew Bailey advocates for rigorous testing and safeguards before implementing formal regulations for artificial intelligence.

US Politics • 2 hours ago
Bank of England Governor: AI Regulation Should Not Be the First Step

Andrew Bailey, the Governor of the Bank of England, has stated that regulating artificial intelligence (AI) is not the appropriate starting point. Instead, he called for "rigorous" testing to identify vulnerabilities and establish safeguards to manage risks associated with the technology. Bailey emphasized that while the development of AI should not be halted due to its immense benefits, a system for intervention and defining operational boundaries is crucial.

The debate surrounding the potential risks of AI has intensified in recent weeks. Leaders of major AI firms, including Anthropic and OpenAI, have publicly called for a slowdown in AI development and an internationally coordinated approach to risk assessment and the implementation of safeguards. OpenAI notably announced it would not release its latest AI model citing safety concerns.

However, the idea of slowing down AI development has faced opposition. For instance, former President Donald Trump has asserted that the United States is leading the AI race and intends to maintain that position, stating, "whoever wins AI, wins." Following a summit with leading AI firms like OpenAI and Anthropic, Trump announced that executives had signed a "morally binding" document intended as a "form of protection" from potential AI risks, placing responsibility for technology safety on the companies themselves.

In the United Kingdom, according to Bailey, significant efforts are underway to test AI, with the establishment of the AI Security Institute aimed at developing standards. "But the pace of progress must accelerate," Bailey stated, while also advising a degree of humility. He acknowledged that testing will inevitably reveal failures and unexpected model behavior, but argued that these outcomes demonstrate the necessity of testing rather than its failure. Bailey clarified that testing should not be viewed as a replacement for future regulation, suggesting that a more formal regulatory framework may emerge over time. "But regulation is not, in my view, the right place to start."


Sources