Animal Activists Sue Topgolf Over Bird Deaths

Animal rights activists have filed a lawsuit against Topgolf, alleging that the company's 120-foot-tall nets are responsible for the deaths of thousands of birds across the country over the past eight years. The Legal Action Network for Animals is demanding that Topgolf immediately implement measures to free trapped birds using qualified wildlife rescuers.

According to the lawsuit, Topgolf's alleged disregard for wildlife constitutes animal cruelty under New York state law. Nora Marino, president of the Legal Action Network for Animals, stated in a letter to Topgolf that trapping birds in their netting and causing them to suffer, be injured, or die is illegal. Topgolf operates 103 locations nationwide.

Estimates suggest that if each of its 103 locations nets an average of five birds per year over eight years, more than 4,120 birds could be affected. Barbara Walker, president of Tampa Bay Raptor Rescue, noted that this number could increase significantly in the future.

Frank Floridia, president of the Strong Island Animal Rescue League, reported receiving calls about hawks tangled in the nets at the Holtsville, Long Island Topgolf location twice in the past month. In one instance, Topgolf employees reportedly attempted to free the bird by blowing horns and throwing balls at it, while continuing to operate the facility. While police and fire departments were called, their equipment could not reach the trapped bird, which eventually freed itself, though its survival was uncertain. Floridia added that a week later, another bird was found in the same net. He observed that on the second occasion, Topgolf employees were quicker to shut down the facility, seemingly due to public awareness.

Walker also recounted an incident at a Topgolf in St. Petersburg, Florida, where a man reported eight vultures trapped in the nets. After searching online, she found numerous accounts and video evidence of birds, including a bald eagle, struggling in Topgolf nets. She described instances where fire departments used hoses to dislodge birds.

Activists claim that Topgolf's procedures for dealing with trapped birds vary by location and lack a company-wide protocol. They argue that untrained staff attempting rescues pose a risk to both the animals and themselves, potentially causing further injury to the birds. Marino suggested that Topgolf might opt for cheaper methods of removing birds, even if it results in harm, rather than replacing damaged netting.

Even if a bird escapes the net without dying, activists argue that the trauma and injury sustained while trapped constitute animal cruelty. Topgolf has not yet responded to requests for comment.