Activist Mahmoud Khalil Faces Deportation Over Stance on Hamas
An Algerian activist's refusal to condemn Hamas raises questions about his suitability for U.S. residency and national security concerns.

Activist Mahmoud Khalil, an Algerian national, is facing deportation from the United States, with his refusal to condemn Hamas becoming a central point of contention. Critics argue that his stance, particularly his comments on CNN where he described a question about condemning Hamas as "silly" and "disingenuous," demonstrates a sympathy for the designated terrorist organization that should preclude him from remaining in the U.S.
Khalil, who was reportedly initially detained by Immigration and Customs Enforcement for threatening U.S. foreign policy, is now appealing his deportation on grounds of alleged lying on his visa application. However, the editorial argues that these deportations should be viewed as a national security issue rather than a procedural matter.
Mahmoud Khalil speaks during a news conference in New York, July 14, 2026. AP Photo/Seth Wenig
Historically, the United States has required immigrants to disavow affiliations with illiberal movements and ideologies. The editorial draws a parallel to the 1960s and 1970s, when immigration officials questioned newcomers about communist party affiliations. It suggests that individuals supporting ideologies or groups like Hamas, which has been designated a terrorist organization by the State Department for actions including the murder of Americans, should not be granted entry or citizenship.
The article further links Khalil to Columbia University Apartheid Divest (CUAD), a group accused of rioting on campus in 2024. CUAD's stated goals reportedly include the "total eradication of Western civilization" and the promotion of "global intifada" and Hamas's "armed resistance." The editorial also mentions Mohsen Mahdawi, another leader associated with CUAD and reportedly facing deportation, who is quoted making anti-Semitic statements. The piece questions whether individuals making such statements, such as "I like to kill Jews," would be granted citizenship in the U.S.
The editorial contends that Khalil champions "Palestinianism," which it characterizes as a nihilistic, bigoted, and anti-Western ideology, noting the prominent display of Palestinian flags at anti-American and Marxist protests globally. It suggests that Khalil's activism mirrors the unrest seen in France, where protests over school funding reportedly escalated into riots fueled by "Marxist pro-Palestinian elements."
The author argues that the lengthy and costly legal battles to deport individuals like Khalil and his associate highlight a need for stricter entry controls. The piece concludes by asserting that while free speech is a right, there is no unfettered right to reside in or become a citizen of the United States, especially for those perceived as inciting unrest and harboring animosity towards the country.